"Our parents are grateful
because they're voting. We're the first generation to say that voting is worthless."
Marta Solanis
"Elections have become a
charade, run by the public relations industry.”
Noam Chomsky
Millions of global citizens agree
with the young Spanish woman and the older American intellectual quoted above,
most obviously many in Egypt and Wisconsin. Though the popular uprisings in
that nation and that state are hopeful signs of democracy in the making, resort
to the electoral process only proves the truth of their words. That process is
owned and controlled by the entrenched state power of financial interests and
until money is taken out of the supposedly democratic electoral process, it is
indeed ultimately worthless.
Analysts and apologists for
the electoral defeat of an exciting democratic movement in Wisconsin are
especially galling when they search for excuses and place blame everywhere but
on themselves. Somehow surprised at the introduction of millions of dollars
into the election, they seem to have missed much of american history. While it
is true that a fairly recent supreme court ruling made it possible to shove
even more money into the election business, that political mall has been the
property of the wealthiest financial interests since the nation began. That
things are getting even worse in electoral politics is just another sign that
they’re getting worse for everything and everyone but the owner-controllers of
society.
That top 1% and its
professional servant class in the upper levels of the 99% are getting richer
and will continue to do so if we let them take the movement further from real
change and guide it to worthless campaigns guaranteed to bring out billions of
dollars in support of the status quo, as it is doing for the November elections
in America. That presidential vote will be called the most important one in
history , as they are almost all dubbed by the public relations/advertising
departments of the parties of capital. Millions of sincere voters will flock to
the polls with that belief firmly established by state propaganda for the two
corporate parties, each claiming to offer change with neither meaning of
substance but only of style with the same basic content:
the profit system will rule
under the control of private economic forces, and it will continue to make life
miserable for more people while adding to the morally if not always legally criminal
wealth of a relatively tiny group. That group at the top may contain a few more
who are labeled people of color, multi ethnic, gay or other subdivisions, but
the majority will have far more members of these so-called minorities who need
to see their and our common state and stop allowing themselves to be
permanently divided into sub-human or special-race categories.
The people who worked so hard to oppose the Wisconsin Governor’s
attack on workers and social spending took inspiring action. But the moment it
was routed into electoral policy, especially the ridiculous notion that the governor would be thrown out
for the very political beliefs which got him elected only one year before, the
whole movement was sidetracked if not derailed.
Unions aroused to political
action as almost never before , this time aligned with great sectors of the
general public which is overwhelmingly non-union , soon became their all too
usual lock-step supporters of the democratic party. A movement partly initiated
because of an attack on collective bargaining – really never more than a sop to
capital that has helped keep unions docile and divided – became one run by a
party that relied on a campaign in support of the same candidate who had been
defeated a year before. It’s opposition amounted to charging alleged scandal in
the governor’s past rather than any rallying of the public to a populist
program behind a newly expanded populist base.
Collective bargaining has
long been the affirmative action of the working class, keeping it divided while
doling out special benefits to chosen sectors of that class. Meanwhile most
workers remained unorganized, which is exactly what the owner-controllers of
society wanted and continue to get. The attack on it could have offered an
opportunity – and still may – for unions to speak and act for all workers, not
just “their” members, as was the original purpose of organizing unions. And the
people who rallied to the union’s support at seeing attacks on their own
security if allowing these assaults to continue on others, were acting as
members of a majority and not some authority selected minority fighting for its
rights while being separated from everyone else’s.
The opportunity was lost in a
wasted effort that lead to hurt feelings , recrimination and the all too usual
scapegoating and blaming directed at all but the most responsible for the
defeat: those who demanded a foolish recall and were drubbed by an even greater
margin than the Wisconsin governor had achieved the first time. They even lost
the votes of many union members , showing again how out of touch the leadership
of both the worthless party and its captive unions are with the common people
who make up the seemingly mythical 99%. That magic percentile now falls from the lips of electoral hustlers; the
very political class that keeps it divided among minorities, identity groups,
and thus helpless to act as a
majority speaking with one voice. We can only hope the activists who had
and have a real critique of the politics and economics at the root of our
problem will remain steadfast and not lose any of the faith that motivated them
into action.
The Spanish woman and Chomsky
were hardly speaking against democracy but only pointing out what citizens in
Egypt and Wisconsin have learned:
a process under the control
of ruling minorities cannot pass the test of democracy and must be dealt with
before we can have elections that bring people and parties to power which
represent the changes we desperately need, in Wisconsin, America, Egypt and all
over the world.
The elections in Greece will at least offer that electorate a party
and candidate representing a totally different way of organizing society and
using its wealth. Until we can all have such electoral choices, there is no
sense taking up time and energy to simply insure that state power remains in
the hands of 1% capital and its house servants while the majority continues to
see their collective future disintegrating.
We need to vote with actions that make the political process
truly democratic, and those actions will demand strikes, refusals to cooperate
with authority, withholding of services by other means and more, along with
electoral work only when it can make a difference and not simply reaffirm power
in a new suit, dress, or some other label to reduce a potentially powerful
majority to the relatively helpless group of minorities it has been manipulated
into becoming.
No comments:
Post a Comment