The day passed with more personal and less public
commemorations in 2012 than in the past 11 years , but while tens of millions
have watched videos of the flaming towers to the point of inducing numbness
about the horror, some still advance metaphysical propositions for what was
hidden from all eyes and consciousness but theirs. Many others ask legitimate
questions about why the government did not know what was threatened and why it didn’t
react properly when it was informed of
that threat by the CIA.
The most feverish speculations deny any possibility that the
suicide terrorists who hijacked the planes and killed more than 3,000 others
could have had any reason for their acts. If they existed at all - there are
claims that all 19 were fictitious beings - they were just tools in the hands
of conspirators, who must number in the thousands if one puts all potential
theories into the same mix.
Apart from possibly unconscious racism which often dismisses
the perpetrator-dupes-puppets as “Arabs in caves”, omitting the fact that some
of the cave dwellers had college and even graduate degrees , the doubters make
assumptions about government information control that are certainly reasonable.
Dishonesty is a standard of governments in any crisis and american rulers
easily meet that norm. A history of slanted reporting of almost everything , especially
international conflict, is cause for healthy citizen skepticism. But some of
what passes for critique of the 911 events makes the story of the creation of
the universe in six days, or in the big bang six million millennia ago, seem quaint
little folk tales by comparison.
The most deranged have the buildings prewired to create a
controlled demolition, indicating zero awareness of many things but especially
that “controlled” demolitions cause no harm to surrounding structures. The 911 attack
on the WTC also destroyed buildings
three and four as well as seven, due to fiery debris from the towers falling on
them. This is unknown or disregarded by the true believers in the way that
any suggestion of material evidence can always be seen as part of the plot, as
in: they destroyed the other buildings in order to cover the fact that it was (ominous background music) a controlled demolition (violins swell to piercing
volume).
Also left out of the controlled demo fantasy is the level of
arrangement and coordination necessary to have the towers so wired to explode,
with no one among the thousands who worked and trafficked there every day
noticing anything out of the ordinary, and have the explosion detonated, not by
sending an agent into the building and throwing a switch – much too simple –
but by organizing a conspiracy to dupe 19 “Arabs in caves” into hijacking
planes and killing themselves by crashing them into the towers at which point
the core of the conspiracy – Bush? Mossad? Batman? – could throw the switch
(from a secret location unknown to anyone) to immolate thousands of innocent Americans
so the U.S. could go to war. Makes sense, doesn’t it?
Other claims are that no planes were involved at all and
missiles – secret and invisible – were the cause of the death and destruction.
But these are extremes that many of the skeptics disdain and claim are plants by the conspirators themselves, that group growing in
number as theories expand to the extent that it may involve a population larger
than the number killed that day. And amazingly, not one of these conspirators,
co-conspirators, agents, double agents, munitions experts, national and international
secret keepers and more, in an environment that finds private conversations
regularly filmed, recorded and going viral, have slipped up and revealed
anything. Makes sense, doesn’t it?
Meanwhile, even though some claim that Israel was behind the
plot, that nation and especially its Zionist support group in America get off
rather easily. Recent stories about the Bush administration paying no mind to
CIA warnings about a pending threat of terrorist attack neglect to point out
that the reason for an obsession with Saddam Hussein and not the al Qaida group
was the threat Hussein represented to Israel.
The neocons with the greatest influence over that particular
white house boob were all Israeli lovers who put that nation’s safety first,
easily seeing the interests of a foreign country at least the same as those of the
USA, since that has been the case in our politics for a generation or more.
Hussein was a far greater menace to Israel given his
nation’s aid to Palestinians, even to the point of making financial
contributions to the families of militants who died in suicide terror attacks.
He alone among leaders in the Arab world was not only outspoken in support of
Palestine with words but with deeds as well, and as such represented a serious
threat. So, the Zionist neocons in the Bush advisory cabal laid it on with
passion, and America followed
their advice with embargoes, boycotts and invasions. If that sounds similar to
the current lunacy about Iran, and you think there is a difference in policy
because a religious loony was replaced by a political parasite, guess again.
A battle over american foreign policy has been going on for
some time now between the old wasp wing – white Anglo Saxon protestant - and
the newer dominant jewish Zionist group. Given the weakening status of the
empire in recent years, the wasps have become more outspoken in their criticism
of american adherence to Israeli needs at the cost of our own. The present
regime in the white house got there in great part because of its faithfulness
to the Zionist cause, but once there it has shown some small adherence to the
old foreign policy cabal’s view that maybe we have gone just a bit too far in
bowing before the money provided by the Israeli lobby. This mistaken power of
what is ignorantly called the jewish vote is really the power of that electoral
dollar, since the vote of every jew in the usa, whether liberal, conservative, religious
or atheist, would be enough to carry several communities and one or two cities.
But the power of those dollars helps to buy the votes of the other 97% of Americans
who are kept in rapturous expectation of a better hereafter or a promising
tomorrow if they just keep selecting what seems a lesser evil on election day.
Unfortunately if this idiotic nonsense continues the death
toll is likely to increase, both in the middle east and at home. We can only
hope that minds focused on nearly supernatural invisible forces can focus on
earthly material reality to avoid another deadly war, this time with Iran but
more likely with a great part of a world which is growing tired of an imperial power
showing signs of suffering a form of political Alzheimer’s disease, and this
with its hands on nuclear weapons. The time for imaginative if simplistic
wondering about hidden conspiracy is past; reality has become far too dangerous
and needs to be confronted in the material world.
If Mr Scott says he doesn't believe that WTC7 was taken down by controlled demolition (see some of the youtube videos), and that ergo all three buildings were taken down by controlled demolition (fires have never before or since caused a steel reinforced structure to collapse), and if he says he believes a 757 hit the Pentagon and another one crashed in Shankville, PA when there was no wreckage of the planes in either case, then he's obviously on the Jewish payroll and is following the party line like a good prostitute.
ReplyDeletehi darrell..
ReplyDeleteif you're interested, legalienate can supply you with actual evidence that jesus was not jewish...
he did not attend his barmitzvah!
also, no foreskin exists to show that he was a palestinian!!
yours in truth, justice and fantasy,
the elders of zion...
Actually, Jesus's foreskin did turn up - at Dick Cheney's underground bunker. The former vice-president was apparently using it to set off the pre-planted explosives in the Twin Towers. Others dispute this, however, arguing that babies born to virgins typically lack foreskin. David Ray Griffin is investigating the matter.
ReplyDelete