The
unbalanced relations and divisions of labor between the sexes dates back to
long before patriarchy and had as much to do with nature, originally, as it has
to do with power relations of money, at present. In the earliest societies men
did not hunt and women gather due to any political dominance but to the
physical realities that enabled men to run after and hunt animals for
sustenance while women carried new life within them and had to stay closer to
the nest gathering while developing what would become agricultural skills. It’s
also likely that matriarchy existed due to the seeming powers of creating new
life which were held by women, with possibly millennia passing before
consciousness revealed that men had something to do with the creation of that
life. But like so much else, the advance of what we call civilization has
brought us both higher levels of material possibility and unfortunately lower levels
of morality, both due to the commodity based relations forced on all humans, of
all cultures and both sexes, by capitalist market forces in pursuit of private
profit.
While
living in a warfare state in which global destruction is threatened by nuclear
powered adversaries, especially the USA which is both the inventor and only
user of such murderous powers, much of american consciousness is occupied with this
issue reduced to sometimes idiotic propaganda, while other issues become the
stuff of surreality tv, fake news, and greater profits for the media, legal and
psychology business community. Thus, we surround Russia and China with armadas
and military bases while being told that Russia has destroyed our fictional
democracy and China threatens our economic empire, and are given around the
clock coverage of the renewed discovery that some men are pigs in relating to
women, while some charges and countercharges of wrong doing have far more to do
with the political and economic power of those making or resisting the charges.
Almost
daily allegations, sometimes revelations, of things ranging from sexual indiscretions
to abusive sexual practices lead to scandals causing powerful men to be reduced
or quit their positions of power due to the public scorn which is both bad for
men in business and good for women sometimes in the same business. The fact
that women in some of these cases have waited many years before revealing such
secrets is all due to what is seen as male power and rarely indentified as
market power. The entertainment figures who have “come out” in the case of Weinstein
all allowed his piggish behavior because they wanted-needed-aspired to the
financial success his power might assure them but would possibly be denied if
they had told him to buzz off or smacked his face when he dared disrespect
them. It is pitiful for humans to be reduced to such groveling and submission
before power, and all due to finance. It is also safe to imagine that if Weinstein
looked like Brad Pitt, some might brag about attracting his attention at the
time or be accused of wishful thinking if revealing it years later. The most
important thing to consider is not just the male power exercised but also the economic
power that serves as its foundation, obscuring any sense of self-respect on the
part of victims, all at the upper end of the financial spectrum.
Tens
of thousands of women suffer such disrespect, and much worse, while laboring in
bars, restaurants, malls, coffee shops and other places of lesser financial
reward collection, and usually do so in public silence, even if the outrages
are common knowledge not only to those who suffer but often seen as the price
that must be paid to get-do-succeed at the job. Playboy “Bunnies”, Hooters
“Servers” and other women whose work totally depends on being subjectified as
sexual merchandise, are part of the enormous and profitable sexual marketplace
relatively invisible to those programmed to act in outrage at the treatment of
those in service to a higher echelon at our collective sex mall. But the
reduction of humanity in the pursuit of survival for the worker and profit for
the owners is no different, in essence, at the bistro, the movie studio, the
political palace, or the taco-pizza-burger joint. Those who need jobs are
frequently reduced in humanity but have to go along in order to get or do the
job, and socialized-to-be mistreated women reduced in stature by
socialized-to-be mistreater men should remind us of the common state of humans
reduced by market relations to perform in grudging acceptance of such
disrespect in order to survive.
We
should also consider the notion of justice alleged in believing an accuser
simply because we agree with or have experience of what someone is being
accused of. Our all but totally dependent on double standards culture makes it
profitable for lynch mobs of thought or deed to form very quickly, emotionally
and thoughtlessly, at the provocation of what some of us define as the Deep or
Shallow State. Why is one person deemed a crook-liar-thug for doing what
another person gets away with by being labeled a hero-heroine-savior? How does
one president performing as a sexist slob become heroic when another who speaks
like a sexist slob becomes a villain?
The
social role of male and female is not a simple biological matter, and even that
is being subject to all manner of stress and strain by market forces which
enable some of us to buy sperm or rent wombs and become parents of new life
which never knows one parent. That force of the market, dominant in all our
lives but too often reduced to individual heroes and villains, needs to be
considered in all these matters. If being able to afford profiting a law office
is what amounts to justice, or being able to afford profiting an insurance company
is what amounts to health care, then tolerating sexual abuse will remain a social
reality. Far more than a person or a sex need to stand up against the systemic
forces that keep us apart and at wars with each other, and worse, with nations,
but if women need a model that is sex based, they should consider what happened
100 years ago when women took social action. They worked in a factory and while
they may have suffered personal indignities their common cause was being
overworked and underpaid. When they could no longer tolerate it they shouted,
that’s enough – no more. Their walkout was one of the first actions in an
experience that shook the world. It was called the Russian Revolution, and
American knowledge of it is on a par with our ignorance of what market forces
do to all of us, on both sides of the profit-loss ledger, with the losers
growing in number and the profiteers growing wealth beyond reason. We need to
become a collective people of reason who act as a democratic human race and not
simply a sex or other identity group, to assure our survival as humanity before
we are abused out of existence by being forced into continued action as racial,
cultural and sexual commodities.
This blog is becoming essential reading. Thanks for this.
ReplyDelete