This
is the key racist myth underpinning conquest and domination in the West. The basic
story begins in 15th century England, but in fact it ultimately
traces back to Tacitus. The Aryan race just suddenly appears in history roughly
around where Iran is today. Allegedly unique, Aryans were described as tall and
blonde, with rounder heads than other “races,” such characteristics assumed to
be evidence of superiority. They had an unparalleled commitment to law and
freedom, and conquered everything in their path as they moved continually
westward - west being the direction of greatness – and ended up in the Black
Forest region of what we know of today as Germany. There they became the Teutons,
a perfect race. But difficulties set in because some of them inter-married with
nearby peoples who were not Teutonic, so they lost blood purity and the race
degenerated. That’s how the "dirty” and dark-haired people of the
Mediterranean came to be. Meanwhile, the good Teutons (i.e., the racially pure
ones) just exterminated everyone, thus preserving their superior blood-line.
The good Teutons became the Angles and the Saxons and went to the English
channel, crossed it, and exterminated everyone on the other side, although they
didn’t manage to kill all of the Celts, some of whom remained around Ireland,
but apart from that they did a pretty thorough job of wiping out race competitors.
After that, the colonists came to America, continuing the journey West, and
that’s how “we the people,” founded the finest, freest country the world has
ever seen, with slaves to do the work. “We” refers to Anglo Saxons (at least
the wealthy ones), a world conquering race. This appears in Thomas Jefferson’s
writings, and is universal in the 19th century. Jefferson and others
thought we ought to go back to the 8th century, when they supposedly had the
perfect system of law and justice, before the race was poisoned by immigration
to England from elsewhere than the Norman Conquest. The supposed superior
racial characteristics of the Aryans/Teutons were quite precisely defined, so
much so that Benjamin Franklin didn’t think that the Germans qualified. He said
they were a little too swarthy, and they didn’t pick up “our” customs properly.
And he saw the Native Americans as an obviously inferior race, which meant that
it was right to exterminate them. Teddy Roosevelt claimed that they were
actually the beneficiaries of being exterminated, as were the Filipinos when the U.S. invaded and conquered the Philippines in 1898, killing some
200,000 inhabitants of the islands. In Roosevelt’s view, these were sacrifices
embraced in the glorious cause of producing a superior race. (Roosevelt's favorite term was "English-speaking race," not Anglo-Saxons, as he could not count himself among the Anglo-Saxons).
So racism in the U.S. is not just anti-black racism, it goes
far deeper than that. That’s why every wave of immigrants has been treated with
vicious racial abuse. The Irish were considered like dogs when they first
arrived. Restaurants had signs saying “No Dogs or Irish.” The average life span
of an Irish man was under 20 years old. Jews and Hungarians (“Huns”) were
treated the same way, everyone from Southeastern Europe was. The worst case was that of the Chinese,
who suffered total racial exclusion under the Racial Exclusion Act. But then
came the move to the West, “we” conquered the national territory and later
Mexico, fulfilling our “Manifest Destiny” as a superior race. Then came 1898,
and Washington stole Spain’s colonies, which were in revolt, conquering the Philippines
and then moving on to China. At that point Teddy Roosevelt made one of his
important contributions to racist theory, which laid the basis for the later
Pacific War with Japan. He designated the Japanese “honorary Aryans.” They
looked yellow, but they really weren’t, he said, so they could be “civilized,”
and they could sort of pave the U.S. way into China and the East, and the
empire would keep going until it circled the Earth and got Aryans back to their
original homeland, that is, Iran, or wherever it allegedly was. This fantastic
tale is the ideological justification for white supremacy, and it’s widely
believed, especially in ruling circles.
Sources: Noam Chomsky, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155578524082282
On TR and the phrase "English-speaking race," see Thomas G. Dyer, "Theodore Roosevelt and the Idea of Race," (Louisiana State University Press, 1980), pps. 28-9
Sources:
Kent, Noel J., America In 1900, (M. E. Sharpe, 2000) pps. 98-9
David F. Schmitz, Thank God They're On Our Side - The United States & Right-Wing Dictatorships 1921-1965, (University of North Carolina, 1999) p. 24
John Higham, Strangers In The Land - Patterns of American Nativism 1860-1925, (Atheneum, 1973) p. 132-3
Sources: Noam Chomsky, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155578524082282
On TR and the phrase "English-speaking race," see Thomas G. Dyer, "Theodore Roosevelt and the Idea of Race," (Louisiana State University Press, 1980), pps. 28-9
1900: USA
Anglo-Saxonism
The most popular religion in the country, faith in Anglo Saxon
blood holds that descendants of select German tribes carry a genius for
self-government, nation building, technology, and conquest, which has allowed
them to soar over the “lower races” for 1500 years.
“We are
Teutons, God’s kings of men,” asserts Colonel Robert Bingham, ex-Confederate officer from North
Carolina. Like so many others he believes that manhood, suffrage, and personal
responsibility are exclusively Anglo-Saxon achievements. He confidently asserts
that “every step towards the higher freedom
[was] won in the best blood of our race.”
Anglo-Saxonists thrill to the conquest of the world’s “waste spaces” by the U.S. and Great Britain. Theodore Roosevelt rates the
annihilation of the Indian nations an inspiring demonstration of the
Anglo-Saxon “race destiny” to dominate less virile
peoples. This race potency permitted the original U.S. Colonists to exterminate
the indigenous peoples as part of their Christian duties, with religious
leaders explaining that their victims were outright Satanic creatures “having little of Humanitie but shape.”
Anglo Saxonists admire Admiral Dewey’s smashing of the
dark-skinned Spanish “dons” at Manila Bay, believing it
an expression of the “incarnate tradition
of Anglo-Saxon seamanship,” just one of many superior traits of the “masterful fighting races.” The decrepit, outgunned Spanish fleet reflected
nothing more than an inferior blood line.
Anglo Saxonism enjoys the backing of the new racial sciences,
which posit that racial categories are fixed and final, though still curiously
susceptible to corruption via the horrors of hybridization. Indeed, since
civilized values are progressively destroyed by inter-breeding with the mongrel
hordes streaming through American ports like a river of genetic sewage, racial
amalgamation is said to be the deadliest threat confronting the white race.
A rising tone of alarm takes hold of popular discourse, with
increasing references to the “race problem,” “race
war,” and
the “higher races.”
Kent, Noel J., America In 1900, (M. E. Sharpe, 2000) pps. 98-9
David F. Schmitz, Thank God They're On Our Side - The United States & Right-Wing Dictatorships 1921-1965, (University of North Carolina, 1999) p. 24
John Higham, Strangers In The Land - Patterns of American Nativism 1860-1925, (Atheneum, 1973) p. 132-3
No comments:
Post a Comment