----------Black Panther Aaron Dixon
Former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown recently wrote that “defund the police” is an ill-advised slogan that will hurt Democrats come November, as though the ongoing mass mobilizations around police brutality weren’t fueled by popular rage at the failure of voting or anything else to offer a path to change. “[If] you take away people’s feelings of personal safety,” warned Brown, “you lose voters.” Ah, feelings! A better word would be illusions. The people for whom the police are a constant predatory menace don’t have any personal safety to lose, and they are in a position to burn the country to the ground, as recent events have shown. If they strike the match, all the King’s horses and all the King’s men will not be able to put “personal safety” together again.
Could this alarming prospect be the reason for so much
bizarre behavior from those who have long enjoyed the illusion of physical
security? Like white protesters in Houston kneeling and praying to black
residents to be forgiven their racial sins. Like white police officers in Cary,
North Carolina washing the feet of black pastors. Like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck
Schumer kneeling down dressed in African kente
cloth scarves. Like self-flagellating white people all over the country
allegedly sickened by a legacy of slavery they know little about, expressing
boundless revulsion over their skin color and earnestly demonstrating their
utter unfitness to be or do anything. As convincing as their apparent uselessness
is, where is the intended benefit?
On the other hand, the Black Lives Matter advice that whites
become “allies” of blacks sounds good but lacks clear meaning. Which black people are whites supposed
to make themselves allies of? Barack Obama, who recently helped torpedo a
promising social democratic revival that could have put real $20 bills in the pockets of the George Floyds of this world,
sparing them the horror of fatal police stops over petty or imaginary offenses
triggered by poverty? Candace Owens, who dismisses Floyd as a common criminal
and drug addict entirely unworthy of our sympathy? The Congressional Black
Caucus, which recently voted unanimously to award trillions of dollars in aid
to plundering corporations, thus guaranteeing increased suffering for a large
majority of African Americans, who had little enough to start with and now must
somehow survive with capital consolidating its already massive holdings in the
midst of economic collapse and galloping pandemic?
In short, not all blacks are worthy of support, and many
whites are so crippled by self-accusation that they are incapable of providing
any. Dilemmas like these should make it clear that solving our racial nightmare
will demand more than hashtags and sound bites.
One thing that would help everyone is broad popular
understanding of the problem. African-Americans are endangered by police, not
because of anything they have done, but because of slavery, which was never
entirely abolished. The 13th Amendment declares slavery prohibited
“except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly
convicted,” which allows it to continue under the aegis of the criminal justice
system. The state, as opposed to the individual capitalist, has the authority
to perpetuate the slave codes, which criminalize black life and masquerade as
impartial justice. As a result, our prisons are jammed with black prisoners,
many of whom are dispatched to the chain gang, a form of exploitation that
proved a boon to rapid industrial development in the late 19th
century, and has been enjoying a revival in the era of the “war on drugs.”
Any mention of slavery tends to evoke defensive and dismissive
responses from white people, most commonly that slavery is ancient history and
hardly an American invention. But in fact slavery was only abolished a
century-and-a-half ago, not long in historical time, and was succeeded by Jim
Crow, which viciously perpetuated something very much like slavery for another
century. And the informal apartheid that exists to this day achieves the same
effect as legal segregation did under Jim Crow. Even lynching has not been
entirely done away with, as the George Floyd killing attests. The only notable
difference between Floyd’s murder and the ritual executions of thousands of African
Americans during the Jim Crow era was the people on the sidewalk calling out
for mercy: during segregation they would have been cheering the murderer on.
As for slavery in other lands, it carries with it no
implications for Americans, and it is Americans we are talking about. In any
case, why the constant attempt to evade moral responsibility for slavery? If
your child stood accused of burning down the school cafeteria, would you really
try to complain that she was being singled out unfairly, since arson has
existed all over the world since forever? Probably not.
Discussions of slavery naturally raise the related topic of reparations,
some form of which is definitely owed. After all, the industrial revolution was
based on cotton, which was produced primarily by slave labor in the United
States. Wealth accrued not just to the planter aristocracy of the old South,
but also to textile manufacturers in the North and Great Britain, among other
commercial and financial beneficiaries forming the core of modern capitalism.
As for the slaves, they were not given their “forty acres and a mule” upon
their (partial) liberation, which carried severely destructive consequences for
the entire society down to the present day.
We can no longer accept refusals to discuss redistribution
of the wealth from rich to poor on the grounds that we can’t “just throw money”
at problems. Aren’t we doing precisely that right now to shore up capital
markets? And aren’t they crashing anyway? It was always ridiculous to claim
that the best way to help the poor was to throw money at the rich, but in the
midst of an outright depression it’s frankly suicidal. To make a long story short, we cannot
confront systemic racism without reversing the gift of trillions of dollars of
unearned wealth showered on large corporations in response to the coronavirus
crisis. That money should go to areas of popular need, not narrow centers of
private greed. Only then can consumption rise, jobs return, and a modicum of
justice reign. What are we waiting for?
Equally absurd is the racist ideology underpinning slavery,
which posited that Africans needed white guidance to advance on their journey
from savagery to civilization. This and other perverse notions took hold of even the most “enlightened”
minds. Thomas Jefferson, for example, a child of the Enlightenment and author
of the Declaration of Independence, dismissed Indians as "savages" and patronizingly saw blacks as almost equal to whites. They had
tolerable memories, he thought, but lacked sufficient intellect to understand
Euclid, and were entirely bereft of imagination in his view. Interestingly,
brown women attracted Jefferson more than white women, but he was terrified at
the prospect of losing racial purity, and looked forward to the day when blacks
would be shipped to the Caribbean or returned to Africa, leaving the U.S.
“without blot or mixture.”
Elite thought didn’t improve over the next century. At the
turn of the 20th century anthropologists placed African Americans somewhere
between the great apes and the hominids on the evolutionary scale. Biologists
reported that their average brain weight was less than that of Caucasians, and
substantially less than that of English-speaking Protestants. Psychologists
claimed they were possessed of a primal sexuality and prone to irrationality, especially
under stress or in situations of intimacy. Criminologists and eugenicists
warned of their allegedly innate brutality and hyper-fertility. Race experts
believed they had no mental or physical energy, lacked volition, and worked as
little as possible, preferring indolence and sunshine to developing civilized
artifacts like architecture or literature. One of the most important books
published in 1900 was entitled, “The
Mystery Solved: The Negro a Beast.”
Doctors predicted they would die out from disease and
perversion.
Today, we see the persistence of such prejudicial attitudes,
though now the alleged deficiencies of African Americans are believed to reside
in their history or culture, rather than in their very nature. But such
explanations “might as well be called genetic,” writes educator Jonathan Kozol,
based as they are on presumptions of degradation “imprinted on black people.”
Those who continue to disdain them “see a slipshod, deviant nature – violence,
lassitude, a reckless sexuality, a feverish need to over-reproduce” as being
what they unavoidably are.
But in fact this is not at all what they are, but what a
racist society believes them to be. That society, now riven by tribal warfare
and in a state of accelerating collapse, will not survive if racism is not
rooted out once and for all.
Fortunately, there are signs of a general awakening to this fact. The popular uprising that greeted the murder of George Floyd
has been of unprecedented scope and breadth. Protests more than 100,000 strong broke out in various U.S. cities, with parallel solidarity demonstrations
around the world. Unlike police brutality protests of the 1960s, recent
demonstrations have included a large number of whites, as well as Hispanics,
African Americans, Asian Americans, and people of all ages, along with a large
swath of the middle class. A coalition this broad cannot be ignored, especially
its central demand: an end to the militarized American police state, which
means a change in the very structure of the capitalist state in the United
States.
For the first time in a long time popular forces have seized the initiative and ruling elites are forced to play defense.
For the first time in a long time popular forces have seized the initiative and ruling elites are forced to play defense.
Sources:
On racist views of African Americans at the turn of the 20th century, see Noel J. Kent – America
In 1900, (M. E. Sharpe, 2000); also Willard B. Gatewood, Black
Americans and the White Man’s Burden, 1898-1903, (University of Illinois,
1975)
On recent racist stereotypes see Jonathan Kozol, Savage
Inequalities, (Harper, 1991) p. 192
On Thomas Jefferson's views of Africans, see Eduardo Galeano, Memory of Fire, Vol. 2. (Pantheon, 1987) p. 48
On Jefferson's "without blot or mixture" comment, see Noam Chomsky, "Year 501 - The Conquest Continues," (South End, 1993) p, 22
On possible electoral consequences of protesters' rhetoric, see Willie Brown, "'Defund the police' is bad policy, terrible politics," San Francisco Chronicle, June 13, 2020
On Thomas Jefferson's views of Africans, see Eduardo Galeano, Memory of Fire, Vol. 2. (Pantheon, 1987) p. 48
On Jefferson's "without blot or mixture" comment, see Noam Chomsky, "Year 501 - The Conquest Continues," (South End, 1993) p, 22
On possible electoral consequences of protesters' rhetoric, see Willie Brown, "'Defund the police' is bad policy, terrible politics," San Francisco Chronicle, June 13, 2020
On recent bizarre behavior from white people, see Matt Taibbi, "The American Press is Destroying Itself," June 12, 2020 https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-news-media-is-destroying-itself
On
the economic roots and benefits of slavery see George Yancy and Noam
Chomsky, "Noam Chomsky on the Roots of American Racism," March 18, 2015 https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/18/noam-chomsky-on-the-roots-of-american-racism/On the Aaron Dixon quote, see Yoav Litvin, "Living the Panther Dream - An Interview with Black Panther Party Veteran Member Aaron Dixon," Counterpunch, June 19, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment