Saturday, March 1, 2025

Trump Truth Bombs Unleash New Wave of Trump Derangement Syndrome

A tsunami of Trump Derangement Syndrome is washing over us once again in the wake of the White House meeting between Volodmyr Zelensky, President Trump, and Vice-President Vance. Trump and Vance took Zelensky to task for opposing a cease fire, forcing Ukrainian conscripts into an already lost war, throwing good money after bad, and demonizing Vladimir Putin to the point of making peace negotiations impossible. The remarkable confrontation played out like a reality TV episode, one in which Trump did everything but shout in Zelensky's face: "You're fired!", a fate the seriously unfunny comedian more than deserves.


As usual, simplistic characterizations rather than insight dominates the headlines. Zelensky is a "democratic leader" and  Putin is a "dictator," although Trump has - gasp! - called Zelensky himself a dictator. This judgment, our mind managers tell us, is just more evidence of how stupid Trump and his MAGA supporters are. How could Zelensky, champion of the Free World, possibly be a dictator?  Just because he jails his political opponents, bans independent media, and shuts down religious organizations doesn't mean he isn't a democracy-loving freedom-fighter. How could it? 

 

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell is incensed that Trump is "not educable," thus incapable of understanding that U.S. media hacks are infallible in their "value-free" judgments about political reality. Trump "knowingly lies" about key statistics like how much aid the U.S. has sent to Ukraine. Horrors! This he takes to be far more significant than the fact that Trump correctly states that (1) Ukraine cannot defeat Russia on the battlefield (2) that it is therefore pointlessly sacrificing huge numbers of its own people, and (3) that it is "risking WWIII," (especially when it shoots U.S. ATACM missiles deep into Russian territory as it did in the final months of the Biden administration). O'Donnell and his fellow media hacks don't enlighten their audience about any of this, which is the heart of the story vis-a-vis the Ukraine war. Lies of omission, as the late Aldous Huxley noted, are the most effective element of propaganda.*

 

Putin has long objected to NATO expansion, as any Russian head of state necessarily would, and questioned why it still exists after the parallel Warsaw Pact disbanded at the conclusion of the Cold War. The West continually stated that it didn't want any more Berlin Walls, even as it kept expanding the Russia-hating military alliance to the East. NATO liked to claim that it was transforming itself into more of a political organization than a military one, to which Putin sensibly replied, "but if it's a political organization, why did it bomb Yugoslavia?" (in 1999).

 

For Moscow, following through on the Minsk Accords, adopted by Russia, France, Germany, and Ukraine in 2015 and endorsed unanimously by the UN Security Council, was the only path to progress in Ukraine, which had essentially become an extension of NATO. The agreement implicitly assumed no formal membership in NATO for Ukraine, an outcome that any Russian leader would have had to insist on. It called explicitly for disarmament of the Donbass and withdrawal of Russian forces while basing the overall settlement on three elements: (1) demilitarization (2) restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty (3) full autonomy for the Donbass.  


The Minsk Accords were never implemented because Ukraine didn't want them to be and Washington didn't insist on them.

 

Putin has long objected to the U.S.-dominated, "democratic" world order, which is built around Washington using force in international affairs without a thought to the consequences, as in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Putin especially disliked the U.S. overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya. The UN resolution authorizing a no-fly zone over that country was "defective and flawed," he said, because, "It allow[ed] them to do what they like, to undertake any manner of actions against a sovereign state." It reminded him, he said of "a medieval crusade." 

 

In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly at the end of September in 2015, Putin blamed the refugee crisis (roughly five million people displaced) stemming from the Syrian civil war squarely on the West, which had induced hundreds of thousands of desperate families to rely on rickety boats to flee to Greece, the nearest European Union state. The U.S., which supported ISIS, was behaving as though there were "good terrorists and bad terrorists," Putin thought, without noticing that there was no easy way to distinguish the two groups. "Is it," asked Putin, "that the so-called moderates behead people more delicately or in more limited numbers?" Touche.

 

For Washington's neo-con crusaders, the "good" terrorists are whichever ones they're cynically using at the moment, which is why no one should be surprised that the head-choppers displaced Bashar al-Assad in Syria with U.S. air support last fall. Eight months from now they will commemorate 911 for the twenty-fourth time, piously renewing their imaginary permanent opposition to jihadi-style terrorism.


By comparison, Putin is a saint.


 

*Overt lies are also important, of course. For example, Zelensky's claim that Putin did not comply with a 2019 cease-fire and prisoner exchange is not correct. There are photos of the prisoner exchange, which was carried out according to the negotiated agreement. See Aaron Mate and Katie Helper on the Useful Idiots podcast, March 3, 2025.

 


Sources:


Lawrence O'Donnell, "Trump Humiliated again on world stage by British PM," The Last Word, MSNBC, February 28, 2025

 

"Putin" by Philip Short (Henry Holt, 2022) p. 369, 522, 588-9, 652


Noam Chomsky with C. J. Polychroniou, ed. "Illegitimate Authority - Facing The Challenges of Our Time," (Haymarket, 2023), p. 160

Friday, February 21, 2025

Malcolm X: Man of Peace

"Malcolm was our manhood, our living black manhood."

------Ossie Davis 

 

"Treat me like a man, or kill me."

-------Malcolm X[1]

 

 

February 21, 2025 marks sixty years since Malcolm X was gunned down in a hail of bullets at the Audobon Ballroom in New York City as he was starting to give a speech. The previous week his house had been firebombed, and days before that the French government had refused to allow him into the country to fulfill a speaking engagement, apparently fearing the assassination might take place on French soil. 

 

Malcolm fully expected these attempts on his life, which grew out of circumstances surrounding his break with the Nation of Islam the previous year. U.S. intelligence had infiltrated his security team, and at the time of his death Malcolm recognized that though the assassination plot originated with the corrupt advisers around Elijah Muhammad in the Nation of Islam, by the end the circle of intrigue had broadened considerably and the U.S. government was certainly involved.

 

Malcolm was undergoing rapid transformation in the final year of his life. He renounced the aberrant strand of Islam favored by Elijah Muhammad, shed his view that white people could do nothing to end racism, and apologized for having repeatedly called civil rights leaders "Toms" and other degrading nicknames. He lectured and traveled widely, met and talked with important leaders of national liberation movements abroad, and embraced a broad, internationalist vision focused on delivering freedom and justice to all peoples regardless of race. But he stuck to his view that black unity in the United States was a pre-requisite to any constructive change in American race relations.

 

Though often portrayed as a violent extremist (he insisted on self-defense against racist attacks), he was actually quite conservative in his habits (he didn't drink, smoke, gamble, or swear), and was never known to have laid a hand on anyone. James Baldwin considered him one of the gentlest men he ever met, and when Baldwin was once called on to referee a debate between Malcolm and a young civil rights activist - on the assumption that Malcolm would overpower the youth - Baldwin discovered that he was not at all needed. Like an oldest son protecting a younger brother, Malcolm treated the youngster with tender solicitude, smiling indulgently and gently correcting his view that being born in the U.S. was all it took to be a full U.S. citizen: "Now, brother, if a cat has kittens in the oven, does that make them biscuits?"[2]

 

The same gentleness was evident in Malcolm's home life. In a 1992 interview his daughter Attalah remembered him as a firm father, a mushily romantic husband, and a gentle and funny presence sparking frequent laughter throughout the house. Though work required he be away for long periods, he managed to be present even when he was absent by hiding little surprises around the house for his daughters. Then when he was on the road, he would send letters home telling them to go into a certain room and look in a special place to find a treat he had left for them.[3] 

 

How did such a man gain a reputation for uncontrolled rage and violence? Easy. He was born in a deeply racist country.

 

He grew up broke and hungry in a family of eight. "We were so hungry we were dizzy," he recalled years later.[4] His father Earl died when Malcolm was six, run over by a rail car, and his mother was slowly driven insane trying to raise eight children alone after her husband's life insurance company refused to honor the $10,000 policy it had issued him.[5]

 

Disciples of Marcus Garvey, Malcolm's parents were proud and rebellious, living isolated from whites but refusing to reside in officially segregated housing. Malcolm's father took his son along on trips to secret, private homes to hear the "Back To Africa" gospel. This early public exposure with its heavy emphasis on black racial pride prepared Malcolm for the speaker's platform and the barricades years later,[6] but he took a very circuitous route before re-connecting with Garvey's ideas and fashioning them into his life's work and legacy after years of evasive wandering.[7]

 

Born in Omaha, raised in Lansing, the flash of Michigan street life claimed Malcolm by age twelve. Strutting into town with a fistful of reefers, he was soon seen as a rising star on the streets. Bold to the point of recklessness, he openly challenged authority, once telling a notoriously abusive police officer who put a gun to his head to, "Go ahead! Pull the trigger, Whitey." [8]Kids who knew Malcolm at the time foresaw a future of jail and an early grave for him.[9]

 

Malcolm’s fascination for the streets deepened at fifteen, when he spent a summer in Boston, where he was exhilarated by the neon lights, fancy cars, and late-night partying.[10] Though he briefly returned to Michigan, he couldn’t help but be impressed by the fact that blacks from New York and Boston always had a hustle going that gave them money or kept them in clothes, a far better fate than being a ditch-digger or a janitor, which was the limit of realistic black aspirations in the Mid-West. Boston soon proved to be his most natural habitat, a place where he could live out his desire to survive by his wits.[11]

 

Living with his half-sister Ella on "Sugar Hill," Malcolm loathed the status-conscious blacks he encountered there, preferring to hang out with "his people" in the "valley" below:  pool sharks, pimps, hustlers, and hard-working blacks pursuing snatches of weekend escapism. They, and the pawnshops, bars, pool halls, cheap restaurants, walk-up flats, barbershops, beauty salons, and storefront churches that surrounded them, were Malcolm's entire world.[12]

 

Blessed with a steely self-confidence taught him by his Garveyite parents, Malcolm thrived in this environment and quickly developed a commanding presence that belied his age. But he rejected his parents' proud work ethic, and cared not a whit about morality or religion. A fast-talking con artist who excelled at finessing himself out of dangerous situations, easy money was all he lived for.[13]

 

Employed as a shoeshine "boy" at a Boston dance hall, Malcolm was thrilled to see the great bands of the day - Count Basie, Cab Calloway, Gene Krupa, Ella Fitzgerald, Glenn Miller, Tommy Dorsey, and the Andrews sisters.[14] No small part of his excitement was making piles of cash as the middleman for sexual hookups of white men wanting black women and white women wanting black men, proclivities that were not at all in line with racial pronouncements in the land of the supposedly free.[15] Malcolm’s knowledge of this reality would prove to be a source of great uneasiness in his future debate opponents.

 

Inevitably, Malcolm’s life as a hustler drew him to Harlem, where he attracted broad attention with his wide-brimmed hats, orange shoes, and exuberant, loose-fitting “zoot suits.” A familiar figure at uptown magnets like the Audobon Ballroom, Smalls Paradise, the Theresa Hotel, and the Savoy and Renaissance Ballrooms, Malcolm narrowly escaped death on various occasions working as a quasi-pimp, petty thief, and drug dealer for traveling musicians and curbside junkies. His ambition, he wrote in his autobiography, was “to become one of the most depraved, parasitical hustlers among New York’s eight million people.”[16]

 

After eight years of drug-dealing, burglary, numbers-running, and occasionally armed robbery, Malcolm landed in a Massachusetts federal prison at the age of twenty.[17] There he underwent a religious conversion, gave up drugs, dedicated himself to Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam, and became a voracious reader and skilled debater. Paroled in 1952, within a year he was named assistant minister of Temple No. 1 in Detroit, and the year after that minister of Temple No. 7 in Harlem.[18]

 

He soon proved himself an extraordinarily adept disciple, gaining a reputation as the most ascetic young zealot for Allah imaginable.[19]A superb organizer and proselytizer, he was adored by Harlem blacks for his courage and wit, and they called out to him to "make it plain" with his blunt and uncompromising declarations and exquisite sense of drama. He was far and away the Nation’s most effective recruiter, provoking envy and resentment among his peers, which would ultimately form the basis for his assassination. In just a few years, he expanded the flock of the faithful from a few thousand members to many tens of thousands, easily surpassing the efforts even of Elijah Muhammad himself. He was especially good at making converts on streets he formerly prowled as a hoodlum.[20]

 

In short, he found his calling as a minister, though it was not his first choice. In his final year in school his eighth grade English teacher had urged him to “be realistic about being a nigger” and abandon his goal of becoming a lawyer. In a way, though, Malcolm ended up achieving his goal, becoming the most electrifying “lawyer” in U.S. history by relentlessly advancing the most powerful case ever made against American racism.

 

Possessed of a fierce, nationalist critique and a broad international outlook, no one could take Malcolm in debate. A spell-binding speaker with a bitter wit, he spoke in an emotionally charged tone of angry eloquence that blacks considered "good preaching,"[21] always bristling with unimpeachable facts leading directly to heretical conclusions. When unwary adversaries detected what they naively took to be loopholes in his arguments, James Baldwin once observed, they quickly found out they were really hangman's knots that left their cherished rebuttals dangling lifeless in mid-air. 

 

Taught to be humble and submissive, his eyes burned defiance. Told to moderate his politics, he preached revolution "by any means necessary." Advised to imitate "responsible" civil rights leaders, he brought huge black audiences roaring to their feet by detailing the racist brutality of which they were the constant victims.

 

Drug dealer, convict, hustler, thief, Malcolm rose to become the greatest black revolutionary of the 20th century, a prophet telling truths few could comprehend and nobody wanted to hear.[22] Deeply religious, he identified the fight for justice as the central act of faith, which made him that rarest of men who practice what they preach.[23]

 

Flatly refusing to abide the hypocritical pieties of racist Christianity, he angrily denounced the nerve of its God and his preachers for plaguing American blacks in the name of love. He found temporary solace and self-respect under the paternal guidance of Elijah Muhammad, but ultimately could not accept a theology claiming that whites were a genetically impoverished, degenerate race of “blue-eyed Devils,” however compelling the thesis might appear in a white supremacist society dedicated to slavery, lynching, and segregation.[24]

 

Nevertheless, it has to be conceded that the Nation of Islam was a considerable draw in the North, being a religion created by and for blacks, especially those trapped in ghettos and prison, and highly effective at teaching discipline and self-respect as a cure for drug addiction, crime, unemployment, gambling, prostitution, and juvenile delinquency, among other problems routinely found in such environments.[25]

 

Seeing clearly the connection between low self-esteem and such vices, Malcolm indignantly rejected civil rights supporters claiming that blacks should love whites, insisting instead that they love themselves, at least enough to rise in self-defense when violently attacked, as they all too frequently were. He recommended that advocates of the “love your enemies” approach teach it to the Klan before  expecting it of blacks, and insisted in the meantime on "an eye for an eye" as the only language a racist oppressor could reasonably be expected to understand.[26]

 

Appealing to the conscience of the oppressor was simply a fool's errand, Malcolm thought, as the whole point of racism was to allow whites to subjugate blacks on the pretext that they were sub-human and therefore by definition without rights. There was no point in appealing to a conscience that either didn't exist or wasn't allowed to exist, which amounted to the same thing.[27]

 

As sit-ins swept the south in the early sixties Malcolm denounced the hypocrisy of nonviolence at an appearance in Alabama. "If the Negro clergy didn't discourage us from participating in violent action in Germany, Japan, and Korea to defend white America from her enemies,” he announced, “why do these same Negro clergymen become so vocal when our oppressed people want to take the same militant stand against these white brute beasts here in America who are now endangering the lives and welfare of our women and children?"[28]

 

Though a committed Muslim, the most influential holy book Malcolm had to appeal to was the Christian Bible, as he had no path to large black audiences until and unless he successfully engaged with the religious tradition they were most familiar with. Elijah Muhammad taught that whites were simply evil, preaching Christianity to blacks to make them hate themselves, with devastating consequences.[29] With more political sophistication than Muhammad, Malcolm developed the most formidable race critique of Euro-American Christianity of anyone in the modern world, condemning the faith as a "perfect slave religion" that preached salvation in the next life to enslaved, colonized, and segregated blacks while white hypocrites had their heaven in this world.[30]

 

Malcolm blamed the plight of blacks squarely on their acceptance of this white racist Christianity. "Christianity is the white man's religion," he emphasized. "The Holy Bible in the white man's hands and his interpretations of it have been the greatest single ideological weapon for enslaving millions of non-white human beings. Every country that the white man has conquered with his guns, he has always paved the way, and salved his conscience, by carrying the Bible and interpreting it to call people 'heathens' and 'pagans'; then he sends in his guns, then his missionaries behind the guns to mop up."[31]

 

Rejecting focus on the hereafter, Malcolm told his black audiences that their hell was obviously right here on earth. "Hell is when you're dumb. Hell is when you're a slave. Hell is when you don't have freedom and when you don't have justice. And when you don't have equality, that's Hell."[32]

 

One of Malcolm’s greatest strengths was his courage in adopting unpopular stances when conscience and the facts demanded it. Unlike Christian ministers, for example, who reflexively sided with Israel’s Jewish-supremacy in the Middle East, Malcolm's support for the Arab world was so fervent that he was frequently labeled anti-Semitic.[33] He would not have been at all surprised at Israel’s current wholesale massacre and expulsion campaign in Gaza.

 

Unlike civil rights leaders, Malcolm rejected the self-defeating idea that blacks in the United States were a small minority, internationalizing his focus to state that they were in fact part of a world-wide Islamic community of "725 million Muslim brothers and sisters in Africa, Asia and in the brotherhood of Islam," also pointing out that people of color with more than passing familiarity with white racism formed the vast majority of the world's population.[34]

 

Finally, Malcolm’s critical dissection of the March on Washington demonstration in Washington D.C. in August 1963 showed unique insight into the direction black rage was beginning to take due to the persistence of white terrorism after nearly a decade of “non-violent resistance” that was supposedly the cure for it. Acidly dismissing the protest as "the farce on Washington," Malcolm deftly pointed out this appropriate and necessary anger had been deliberately excluded from the day’s agenda:


"
The Negroes were out there in the streets . . . .They were talking about how they were going to march on Washington . . .That they were going to march on Washington, march on the Senate, march on the White House, march on the Congress, and tie it up, bring it to a halt, not let the government proceed. They even said they were going out to the airport and lay down on the runway and not let any airplanes land. I'm telling you what they said. That was revolution. That was revolution. That was the black revolution."

No leader had any chance of stopping it: 

 

"It was the grass roots out there in the street. It scared the white man to death, scared the white power structure in Washington D.C. to death; I was there. When they found out that this black steamroller was going to come down on the capital, they called in . . . . these national Negro leaders that you respect and told them, 'Call it off.' Kennedy said, 'Look, you all are letting this thing go too far.' And Old Tom said, 'Boss, I can't stop it because I didn't start it.' I'm telling you what they said. They said, 'I'm not even in it, much less at the head of it.' They said, 'These Negroes are doing things on their own. They're running ahead of us.' And that old shrewd fox, he said, 'If you all aren't in it, I'll put you in it. I'll put you at the head of it. I'll endorse it. I'll welcome it. I'll help it. I'll join it.'"

And this co-optation worked like a charm: 

 

"This is what they did with the march on Washington. They joined it . . . became part of it, took it over. And as they took it over it lost its militancy. It ceased to be angry, it ceased to be hot, it ceased to be uncompromising. Why it even ceased to be a march. It became a picnic, a circus. Nothing but a circus, with clowns and all. . . ."

No dictator could have achieved more thorough control: 

 

"No, it was a sellout, a takeover. They controlled it so tight, they told those Negroes what time to hit town, where to stop, what signs to carry, what to sing, what speech they could make, and what speech they couldn't make, and then told them to get out of town by sundown."[35] 

 

So James Baldwin flew all the way from Paris, but was not allowed to speak. John Lewis’s speech wondering why the government could indict civil rights activists for civil disobedience but couldn’t bring white terrorists to justice or even stop appointing racist judges to the bench was censored by John and Robert Kennedy, a decision with which Dr. King went along. Lewis read a watered-down speech absent his pointed inquiry – “I want to know – which side is the federal government on?” - while two JFK aides stood by ready to pull the plug on his microphone should he fail to follow the script.[36]

 

Eighteen days later four black girls attending Sunday School in Birmingham were blasted into eternity at the 16th Street Baptist Church.

 

Though Malcolm spent the last thirteen years of his life trying to prevent America’s racial powder keg from exploding into irreparable disaster, the capitalist media never ceased to portray him as a violent madman. After his brutal assassination the New York Times heaped scorn on what the editors took to be Malcolm’s “pitifully wasted” life marked by “ruthless and fanatical belief in violence.” The Washington Post bid good riddance to him as “the spokesman of bitter racism.” Newsweek mocked Malcolm for “blazing racist attacks on the ‘white devils’ and his calls for an American Mau Mau.” Walter Winchell dismissed him as a “petty punk,” and the Nation magazine back-handedly complimented him for being the “courageous leader of one segment of the Negro lunatic fringe.”[37]

 

One of Martin Luther King's associates, Alfred Duckett, provided a far more accurate view, calling Malcolm "our sage and our saint," a prophet who inspired his black brothers and sisters to fight back against racism and persecution. Even Dr. King had to concede that Malcolm's portrayal of the plight of American blacks was accurate and his rage authentic, once reportedly telling a friend that "I just saw Malcolm on television. I can't deny it. When he starts talking about all that's been done to us, I get a twinge of hate, of identification with him."[38]

 

But it may have been Malcolm himself who was the most reliable source on what his work was about, saying in his autobiography that, “sometimes I have dared to dream . . . that one day, history may even say that my voice – which disturbed the white man’s smugness, and his arrogance, and his complacency – that my voice helped to save America from a grave, possibly even fatal catastrophe.”[39]

 

 

Sources:

 

James H. Cone, "Martin & Malcolm & America - A Dream or a Nightmare," (Orbis, 1991)

 

Les and Tamara Payne, "The Dead Are Arising - The Life of Malcolm X" - (Norton, 2020)

 

Alex Haley ed., "The Autobiography of Malcolm X," (Grove, 1964)

 

Howard Zinn, “A People’s History of the United States,” (Vintage, 2003)

 

Taylor Branch, “At Caanan’s Edge – America in the King Years, 1965-68, (Simon & Schuster, 2006)

 

Barbara Rogers interview with Attalah Shabazz, "Bay Sunday," November 15, 1992

 

Michael K. Smith, “Portraits of Empire,” (Common Courage, 2003)

 

 


[1]Cone, p. 251

[2] Smith, p. 110

[3] Barbara Rogers, “Bay Sunday,” November 15, 1992

[4] Payne, p. 94

[5] Payne, p. 89. Malcolm thought his father had been murdered by the Klan, but this appears not to have been the case.

[6] Payne, p. 86

[7] Payne, p. 75

[8] Payne, p. 122

[9] Payne, p. 122, 145

[10] Payne, p. 141

[11] Payne, p. 146

[12] Payne, p. 152

[13] Payne, p. 115

[14] Payne, p. 152-3

[15] Payne, p. 155-6

[16] Payne, p.  168, 170, 174

[17] Cone, p. 154

[18] Payne, p. 272, 274

[19] Payne, p. 278

[20] Payne, p. 285

[21] Cone, p. 172

[22] Cone, p. 152

[23] Cone, p. 164

[24]Cone, p. 170. The worst effects and limitations of Elijah Muhammad’s views were altered or eliminated in Malcolm by his frequent interactions with white university students.

[25] Cone, p. 162

[26] Cone, p. 160

[27] Cone, p. 166

[28] Cone, p. 176

[29] Cone, p. 162

[30] Cone, p. 166

[31] Cone, p. 166, 170

[32] Cone, p. 174

[33] Cone, p. 163

[34] Cone, p. 164

[35] Zinn, p. 457-8

[36] Quoted in Cone, p. 181

[37] Branch, p. 11, 373

[38] Cone, p. 251, 256

[39] Cone, p. 181

 

Monday, January 27, 2025

The Problem With Mass Deportation To "Shithole" Capitalist Extraction Zones

 "Before talking about cracking down on undocumented people here, why can't there be a discussion about the United States' role in fueling migration abroad. There's something really unfair to me about the United States having policies that destabilize countries, crippling sanctions that force people to leave . . . If you look at all the countries that are the source of migration you can trace their history and see a huge role of U.S, meddling. For example, take Central America. The United States has been propping up dictators there, supporting death squads, for large parts of the twentieth century. Haiti, since its foundation, the U.S. has been meddling with it, because Haiti was the first free country of this hemisphere, a country of freed slaves who revolted against their French colonizers. And France and the United States have been punishing Haiti for that ever since. Any discussion to me about dealing with people fleeing these counties needs to deal with the U.S. role in destabilizing them to begin with. And some sort of efforts to address that. It's not fair to help destroy foreign countries and then when people flee to basically punish the people that are trying to build better lives for themselves."

-----Aaron Mate, Useful Idiots, January 27, 2025

 

Someone needs to tell Saagar Enjeti of Breaking Points that U.S. sponsored disasters leading to mass migration are not a relic of the Reagan years, as he has somehow convinced himself is the case. Many U.S. sponsored coups (and coup attempts) are quite recent, as can be seen below:


2002 - present - Venezuela.

Unsuccessful U.S. coup against an indigenous revolution opposed to U.S. imperialism. Hugo Chavez was briefly overthrown in 2002, then returned to power by a popular uprising. Washington has never stopped trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government ever since.


2004 - Haiti. 

Successful U.S. coup against champion of the poor Jean Bertrand Aristide, who was hustled out of the presidential palace in his pajamas by U.S. Marines and deported to Africa. A hideous reign of terror persists down to the present.


2008 - Bolivia. 

Unsuccessful U.S. coup against President Evo Morales, a strong critic of U.S. imperialism.


2009 - Honduras. 

Successful U.S. coup against Manuel Zelaya. Coup plotters were trained by Washington at Fort Benning, Georgia, which is known in Latin America as "the school of coups" thanks to the bloody achievements of its graduating classes.


2010 - Ecuador.

Unsuccessful U.S. coup against socialist President Rafael Correa, a principled critic of U.S. imperialism.


2011 - Libya.

Successful U.S. overthrow of Moammar Qaddafi


2012 - Paraguay.

Successful U.S. coup against Fernando Lugo, whose fondness for liberation theology's "preferential option for the poor" (i.e. decent treatment) was an affront to wealthy investors and national security state fanatics.


2013 - Egypt. 

Successful U.S. coup against the democratically-elected government of Mohamed Morsi. 


2014 - Ukraine.

Successful U.S. coup against a pro-Moscow government.


2018 - Nicaragua.

Unsuccessful coup attempt against the government of Daniel Ortega, a key leader of the 1979 Nicaraguan revolution.


2019 - Bolivia.

Successful overthrow of socialist Evo Morales.


1959 - present - Cuba.

U.S. invasion of the island at the Bay of Pigs failed in 1961. Sore losers, U.S. imperialists have tried everything to destroy the Cuban revolution ever since.




 



Wednesday, January 22, 2025

New Year? We Need A Whole New World

 

 

 

 

Late in 2024 a board member of an American health insurance company was murdered by an American privileged class member who instantly became a semi-folk hero for taking direct action against one of many despised aspects of a private profit political economy which in the case of health insurance kills, maims and consigns to misery many who cannot afford to pay their rates. On the very first day of 2025 an American of less privilege murdered 14 innocent people just out celebrating and innocently becoming victims of the same system that got the health insurance executive killed though there was much less sympathy for the military veteran guilty of the crime because his murder of innocents was the result at least in part of hatred for America’s long assault in defense of Israel but directed against not only Palestinians, in the most murderous sense, but all the people of the middle east who are reduced to “terrorists” because unlike the U.S, Israel and other western powers, their retaliatory violence is taken by people usually not wearing uniforms and working for a murderous group acting as armies, navies and other titled members of  western, usually American murder brigades.

 

Whatever the class background of the American assailants they were both taking personal actions against individuals for the actions of a political economic system taking more lives and destroying more of nature every second of every minute of every day. With massive profits accumulating faster than ever for a smaller and smaller group of humanity and in ever greater amounts so that while these enormous profits sustained by attacks on humanity and other parts of nature innocent people are manipulated by anti-social media thought control into believing individual villains are responsible, whether fantastically wealthy people like the health insurance board member or ordinary folks just out celebrating a new year beginning and innocently losing their lives in the process.

 

This as a new regime was about to be sworn in with many thinking the new corporate CEO, or president, is different from others because this time a human practing artificial intelligence will be taking office. Just as in the case of previous presidential murderers credited with being very bright people or murderous nuts, depending on which anti-social media channel is being watched, while the president has far more responsibility in allegedly running the collapsing mess of American and global capitalism he she or it is no more responsible for the system than the December or January murderers. It started, long before any of us were born and if we don’t stop it soon we may all go the way of those victims.

 

As for our alleged democracy, in the just completed as in mostly every election in history the non-votes outnumbered either those for winner Trump or loser Harris.  This quote from someone alleged to be among the brightest people in history sums it up:

 

‘”…What we see at work is not an expression of the sentiments of the American people; rather it reflects the will of a powerful minority which uses its economic power to control the organs of political life

 

Albert Einstein

Einstein on peace pg. 343

 

And perhaps most clearly this part of a song lyric by the Rolling Stones from back in the 60s:

“spare a thought for the stay at home voter

whose eyes perceive such a strange beauty show

a parade of grey suited grafters

a choice of cancer or polio”

 

The British songwriters clearly saw the spectacle from a different class perspective but were clearly commenting on the same murderous farce.

 

 

Calling the multi billion dollar marketing exercise in voting that supposedly runs the country “our”democracy would be like the domestic slaves of our bigoted history citing their forced servitude as clear evidence of their ownership of the plantation. After all, they lived at a much higher material standard than the field slaves who picked the cotton and suffered the worst physical abuse. The domestics were still slaves but suffered mentally far more than physically and like tens of millions of middle class Americans now who buy into the psych market to find personal peace, they could be assured that their own shortcomings, not a bestial system of slavery, was responsible for their problems. That, while fully knowing that most of them were the sons and daughters of the slave master and mistress who owned them for sexual favors as well as market profits from the cotton they picked, meals they served and countless other favors they performed for their owners.

 

Now we have mass murdering demublicans calling for republicrat Trump to be imprisoned for business swindles and other common market crimes which are the foundation of most financial wealth accruing to a tiny minority while a vast majority pays for destroying life and other nature while being lied to by news and lulled by market forces.  The veteran killer of new years day was an example of the most extreme outcomes of training people to kill, against most human impulse or wishes, leading to far more crimes less horrible than his but equally the outcome of degenerate teaching of anti-humanity to human beings taught to believe it is supposed to be normal if not heroic to murder people. The situation grows more dangerous for humanity and not just the imperial west currently falling apart under the fading control of America due to the imperial military power of a mass murder machine more dangerous than ever before. In fact, many who claim expertise in knowledge of nuclear capabilities claim the danger of a nuclear holocaust is greater than ever before.

 

Meanwhile, innocent millions blame other innocent millions for the horror threatened by a tiny percent of humanity: the ruling class powers of international capitalism, head quartered mostly in The U.S.A.

 

The world is changing rapidly and a new global order is being born among the majority of humans on the planet who are learning to work together to bring about a truly new world no longer under the murderous domination of any imperial power, As citizen consumers who sustain that power we have the greatest responsibility to join the human race – the one and only race despite fictionally created alleged “racial” differences among us – and join the majority in creating a democratic global population before our tiny minority destroys all of us. Capitalist private profits for some need to come after, long after the assurance of public good for all. Happy 2025?

 

Monday, January 20, 2025

How To Raise Public Confidence In Science

"Take private profit out of the picture and replace it with public benefit, engage science without lawyers and maybe create drugs safe for almost everyone. And if I get sick from a drug spare no expense at finding one that will make me better. If I drop dead, apologize and see to my family's survival without me."


                                                ----Frank Scott

 

Amen to the above, a far more sensible reaction to Covid than extravagantly emotional insistence that the virus was part of a deliberate plot to impose a universal police state. The idea that, except for "dictator" Anthony Fauci, one might have enjoyed full civil liberties while an aerosolized virus killed millions of people around the world would be too ridiculous to refute if the consequences weren't so serious.  Suffice it to say that in the U.S. one could barely feel any authoritarian presence at all during the so-called lockdowns, which U.S. cell phone data show to have barely existed in reality.

The real issue with Fauci and scientists in general is that they, like us, unconsciously embrace the contradictions of capitalism, saying nothing about capital-driven deforestation and factory farming, which sharply accelerate the rate of viral evolution and therefore pandemics. Add to this decades of mostly silence about neo-liberal austerity that saw the U.S. outsourcing the production of N95s, eliminating hospital redundancy, shredding public health budgets and attendant pandemic response plans, and you have the makings of our recent Covid disaster. THIS, not conspiracy theories, is what we should be focused on, much more than the alleged "suppression" of anti-vaxxers, who should be sharply criticized, but not suppressed.

Of course Anthony Fauci had to worry about the public health consequences of idiotic commentary about the virus, lockdowns, vaccines and treatment. The more that ignorant or malicious information spreads and is taken seriously, the more people sicken and die unnecessarily. Without a culture of criticism about how capitalism is a pandemic-producing system, there is not much else Fauci could have done except damage control on the circulation of destructive ideas.

The people who suffered by far the most are the more than a million American dead who only died because capitalism left us unprepared for a pandemic, not those saying "open 'er up!" almost from the moment pandemic response measures were put in place.

The failure to offer replacement income was the biggest problem, not the lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

The way out is what Frank Scott offers in the quote above - a system of public profit, which would eliminate lawyers from the discussion, and more importantly, make "Big Pharma" much more transparent and at least nominally a public institution. 

It will take a long time for anyone ensnared in anti-vax propaganda to see that this is indeed the way out. The problem for them, however, is that the Covid era's sharp spike in excess deaths dates from 2020, when the pandemic hit, not 2021, when mass vaccinations began. Also, excess deaths rose in tandem with case increases throughout the pandemic, not with vaccinations.

What we would need to establish that the vaccines are more injurious than Covid itself is proof of the existence of Covid vaccine injury units in hospitals (with injuries and deaths allegedly in the millions, these units should exist in abundance), an academy of science that endorsed not getting vaccinated against Covid, a professional medical association that said the vaccines were too dangerous to take, a virology or immunology department at a medical research university that recommended remaining unvaccinated, etc. 

None of this exists. 

On lab leak, suffice it to say that among scientists the issue was laid to rest long ago because the facts don't fit the theory, which isn't really a theory but a paranoid obsession.

Extremely improbable, though not outright impossible, a lab escape of the virus would have to have involved two leaks, as there were two lineages of SARS-CoV-2 that emerged. One lab worker would have had to have gotten infected, left the lab, crossed the river, traveled to the Wuhan wet market and infected someone there. Then, on a separate occasion, a different lab worker would have to have repeated this. That two workers could do this without infecting anyone else in the lab or on the way to the wet market is extremely unlikely. Also, it's just weird that a lab leak would produce an epicenter exactly in the place where we would expect an animal spillover to occur. There were far more populated sites in Wuhan than the wet market, and one of those sites should have been the epicenter had the virus escaped or been leaked.

They tested the lab workers at the Wuhan lab for the presence of SARS antibodies and none had them. An Australian scientist who worked at the lab confirmed that no one was sick during the relevant time period. Also, none of the bats used in the lab were found to have had SARS.

There's never been a novel virus leaked from a lab. Also, the genetic complexity of SARS-CoV-2 is a problem. There's no highly similar virus that could have served as a kind of template for creating SARS-CoV-2.

A lab leak represents the idea that Fauci-haters most want to believe, not the idea that best accounts for known facts.