Thursday, April 10, 2025

The Method In the Madness: Trump Tariff Meltdown Is An Echo of the Nixon Shock (pulling the world off the gold standard)

"What they [the Trump administration] want is they want to have their cake and eat it [too] . . . .They want to devalue the dollar without jeopardizing the exorbitant privilege of the dollar, the reserve currency status of the dollar . . . . Is this far-fetched? No, it's not far-fetched. They may succeed in doing [so] . . . .I'm not saying they will succeed in doing it, but, what I'm saying is that they have a rational plan, a fiendish plan, as they would say in cartoons, but it is not unprecedented. 

 

"You know, this is why I mentioned the 1970s, 1971, [when] Richard Nixon did exactly the same thing. I mean, in one of his autobiographies, I think he's written more than one, Henry Kissinger, in one of the chapters, just from memory, I read it many years ago. He asks a question in one of the chapters, the chapter title is a question: "Who caused the oil crisis?" And the first sentence is, "We did." And he was very clear on this. 

 

"That myth that it was the Arabs and the OPEC Third World countries that imposed the high prices on America, that's all rubbish. Let's not forget who was in OPEC back then. It was the Shah of Iran, who was on the payroll of the CIA, the Suharto regime in Indonesia, utterly driven by the State Department and the CIA, and Saudi Arabia, which can't move one inch without the OK of Washington DC. 

 

"So why did they create this huge oil crisis then, if Kissinger is right? Remember Richard Nixon sent his Treasury Secretary to the Europeans with a message that 'the dollar, mates, is our currency, and from now on it is going to be your problem.'

 

"Nothing more aggressive has ever been sent to the Europeans. I don't think J. D. Vance said anything worse than that. Indeed, Paul Volcker, who, much, much later became the president of the Federal Reserve, he was a member of that team and he reports that it was Connally, the Treasury Secretary, who convinced Nixon on the fifteenth of August of 1971, to blow up the Bretton Woods system with the following expression, and this is verbatim because it is etched in my memory when I read it. He said, 'Mr. President the foreigners are out there to screw us, and we must screw them before they screw us.' And two days later he blew up the Bretton Woods system.  


 

"He did it for a very simple reason. Once you have deficits, either you go German, in other words, you tighten your belt, you go austerity, big time, like the Germans would do, or they made us (the Greeks) do, or, Nixon was not prepared to do that to his own people and to his own ruling class, to his own country, or, you boost your deficits, if you are the dominant, hegemonic power, which is exactly what Nixon did, and you make other people pay for it. Essentially the American deficit becomes the magnet that magnetizes into the United States both the net exports of the Germans, the Japanese, and the Chinese, and their money, which goes between New York through Wall Street to get recycled in the form of government debt, shares, and real estate. 

 

"So everything . . .  the major shock, the plan to devalue the dollar, the plan to enhance the dollar's hegemony, the plan to damage seriously its most important allies, back then it was Europe and Japan, well, it's more or less the same now, that happened, it included to introduce enormous uncertainty, lots of businesses in the United States suffered, including the markets, the working class was damaged beyond redemption in 1971, '72, '73. 

 

"Remember, American hourly real wages have not recovered to the level that they had in 1973 - to this day - they are lower than they were in 1973. So, you talk about uncertainty, damage, carnage, and all that. Well, Nixon did it. That was the whole point of the Nixon shock. But you know what? It was utterly successful from his perspective. 

 

"Why? Because he managed to create, I'm talking about Nixon now, through his shock, something that has never happened before in human history. Every hegemon, every empire, every large force until 1971, the British Empire, the Dutch Empire, the Spanish Empire, the Portuguese Empire, before that the Roman Empire, every such power that went from being a surplus producer to a deficit producer, lost its power. The United States is the only hegemon whose power has been enhanced by its deficits. And that's due to the Nixon shock. 

 

"So when Trump's men, and a small aside here, when people say that Trump is a very poor excuse for human nature, that he's inarticulate, that he's half-crazy, all that applied to Nixon, right? I mean, was there a man more despicable than Richard Nixon? And yet, the Nixon shock worked. You know, what I find astonishingly ironic, is that all these centrists around the world, in Europe, in Britain, in the United States, who are lamenting the great world that was destroyed by Donald Trump. What world are they lamenting really? The one that was created by madman Richard Nixon's shock. Because everything we have been experiencing recently, taking for granted, globalization, neo-liberalism, financialization, those were the results of a very deliberate plan by Richard Nixon."


-----Yanis Varoufakis, "Yanis Varoufakis Analyzes Donald Trump's Tariff War," Politics Joe, April 8, 2025

Monday, April 7, 2025

Anonymous American Thoughts on Survival

 

 

 

 

Anonymous American Proposes SHAME celebration

 

(Unpublished letter sent to major media)

 

I have nothing but shame about the group we all belong to: Americans. Hundreds of thousands of us have no place to live, millions have no health insurance and all of our tax dollars- whether we have testicles vaginas both or neither, are financing slaughters in Israel and Ukraine and we are threatened with nuclear war. Let me know when there is a shame flag and parade. 

 

We understand how they (present plural form when not certain of sex-gender-political party etc.) feel.

 If the society has real democracy instead of the ugly joke we give that name to, all of our individual and identity group "selfs" can exercise their best motivations, as opposed to the ugliness of so much of present reality with various "selfs" blaming all other "selfs" operating in the same dictatorship of the rich and calling it "our democracy"”

 

 

868 billion for defense…from what? Most Americans are in terror at what other Americans can do to them.

Russia’s “brutal” attack on Ukraine, America’s “gentle loving” slaughters in Korea, Viet name, Cambodia, Laos, Libya, Palestine, Yugoslavia. U S military in nations all over the world but China and Russia are a global threat. Yes, and rapists prevent sexual frustration among their victims.

 

Market capitalist religious service is an economic rite of moral wrong.

 

 We need public banks, public ownership of utilities, employee owned and controlled business which will mean higher wages for majority workers and lower prices for majority consumers by removing the minority anti-democratic anti-social private profit investor class.

 

That means the end of anti-democratic capitalism and the beginning of the democratic communism we practiced in order to survive our earliest experiences of life

 

 

 


 

 

 

Anonymous American Proposes SHAME celebration

 

(Unpublished letter sent to major media)

 

I have nothing but shame about the group we all belong to: Americans. Hundreds of thousands of us have no place to live, millions have no health insurance and all of our tax dollars- whether we have testicles vaginas both or neither, are financing slaughters in Israel and Ukraine and we are threatened with nuclear war. Let me know when there is a shame flag and parade. 

 

We understand how they (present plural form when not certain of sex-gender-political party etc.) feel.

 If the society has real democracy instead of the ugly joke we give that name to, all of our individual and identity group "selfs" can exercise their best motivations, as opposed to the ugliness of so much of present reality with various "selfs" blaming all other "selfs" operating in the same dictatorship of the rich and calling it "our democracy"”

 

 

868 billion for defense…from what? Most Americans are in terror at what other Americans can do to them

Russia’s “brutal” attack on Ukraine, America’s “gentle loving” slaughters in Korea, Viet name, Cambodia, Laos, Libya, Palestine, Yugoslavia. U S military in nations all over the world but China and Russia are a global threat. Yes, and rapists prevent sexual frustration among their victims.

 

Market capitalist religious service is an economic rite of moral wrong.

 

 We need public banks, public ownership of utilities, employee owned and controlled business which will mean higher wages for majority workers and lower prices for majority consumers by removing the minority anti-democratic anti-social private profit investor class.

 

That means the end of anti-democratic capitalism and the beginning of the democratic communism we practiced in order to survive our earliest experiences of life

 

 

 


Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Ripley's Believe It Or Not Says U.S. SignalGate Scandal Defies Belief

Ripley Entertainment's publishing and broadcasting divisions have rejected news of Washington's recent "SignalGate" scandal as a "wildly implausible" Trumpian scam.

 

A spokesperson for the company reacted to news of the scandal with open incredulity: "You want us to believe that Jeffrey Goldberg, former Israeli "Defense" Forces prison guard/Zionist fanatic/paid propagandist, otherwise known as a reporter, was included in an unsecured U.S. national security state GroupChat discussing U.S. war plans with Yemen, specifically a plot to massacre civilians by blowing up an apartment building, which was subsequently carried out, this in revenge for the only effective solidarity with Palestinians visible anywhere on the world scene during what the highest international legal authorities consider an ongoing genocide, and the scandal is that AMERICAN LIVES WERE PUT AT RISK, a great outrage, since Washington's heroic mass murderers are obviously entitled to carry out their civilian massacres in perfect comfort and safety. 

 

"We specialize in the weird and bizarre," said the Ripley spokesperson, but there's got to be a limit.

Sunday, March 30, 2025

How a Jewish State Planted In The Heart of the Arab World Came To Be Seen as a Solution To European anti-Semitism

 

"An atmosphere was created in which it was only natural for the American, with his reverence for the underdog, to accept Zionist propaganda as gospel." 


 -----Alfred Lilienthal, The Other Side of the Coin, p. 93 


"About this little Mediterranean country (Israel) more fables have been written than are contained in Scheherazade and Mother Goose together."

 

 -----Alfred Lilienthal, ibid. 

 


 


Sunday, March 23, 2025

Trump 2.0 Fears Real Democracy

The Second Coming of Trump has arrived with full force and never a dull moment is the word. Jewish supremacy has re-opened the floodgates of Hell massacring Palestinians and pushing for war with Teheran; the triumphant U.S. president has finally expressed some empathy - for Elon Musk! - ("He's being treated unfairly"); and rising waves of popular revulsion at the billionaire duo's contempt for everybody and everything that doesn't directly enrich them have seized the moment and surged into the political foreground.

 

Meanwhile, DOGE's "efficiency experts" are using nutcase Javier Milei's "chainsaw for bureaucracy" to remove the fraud, waste, and abuse from the federal budget - like pediatric cancer research, aviation safety, and medical care for Veterans - all three perverse funding priorities posing obvious obstacles to "Making America Great Again." 

 

Sadly for Trump, his hoped-for record breaking mass deportations have fallen woefully short, not even equaling Joe Biden's pace, a shameful outcome for MAGA given the president's campaign promises, or at least it would be if he were capable of feeling shame. Unwilling or unable to spend the money required for the mass round-ups he promised, Trump has taken to grabbing the low-hanging fruit - unwary legal immigrants passing through airports - including in one case a woman married to a U.S. citizen who once overstayed a legal visa because flights were canceled and the border shut down due to Covid, making it impossible for her to leave on time. Fortunately, this glaring national security threat has been seized and dispatched to immigration jail, an immense relief to dictatorship-loving Americans everywhere.

 

Speaking of national security threats, legal immigrant Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian raised in a refugee camp in Syria, has been smeared as a terrorist and thrown into jail for condemning wholesale U.S.-Israeli extermination in Gaza, the culmination of "never again" pontificating about the Holocaust and its attendant kosher killing campaigns. 


Nevertheless, we have every right to be indignant about Khalil: the bloody nerve of people driven off their land and tortured and murdered for nearly a century raising a voice against the perpetrators! Have they no shame?


There is no relief coming for any of this from the collaborationist Democratic Party, which has spent years claiming that government can't be used to deliver universal health care or a federal jobs guarantee, and certainly not to negotiate our differences with those who object to having their leaders assassinated and their governments overthrown by Washington, standard methods for dealing with popular movements that take majority rule too literally. Democracy does not mean majority rule; it means minority rule with popular ratification, hence the Trump "mandate" to attack and destroy the interests of the majority.*

 

Democratic Party leaders' denial of any constructive role for government in meeting the needs of the majority has left them with nothing to say to the DOGE brigade's meat-axing of government on the grounds that it's all useless bureaucracy. If everything legitimate (apart from the Pentagon) is delivered by the glorious "free market" why shouldn't we gut government programs? 

 

Interestingly, though the Trump administration is in firm control of all three branches of government, it has chosen not to advance its agenda through the at least formally democratic institutions it controls, but rather, by extra-constitutional gambits like DOGE, which is accountable only to Trump, if even him.

 

There couldn't be clearer evidence that the MAGA masterminds do not trust the people they say have given them a mandate to construct a government of the billionaires, by the billionaires, and for the billionaires. With Tesla dealerships being torched and Luigi Mangione raised to the status of a folk hero, there is little chance their agenda could be passed in open Congressional session.

 

Their distrust of the people is very well deserved. Stay tuned.

 


*Trump got 49.8% of the vote in an election with 63% turnout, so his "mandate" consists of slightly more than 31% support of the full electorate. In other words, it's fantasy. 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Trump Truth Bombs Unleash New Wave of Trump Derangement Syndrome

A tsunami of Trump Derangement Syndrome is washing over us once again in the wake of the White House meeting between Volodmyr Zelensky, President Trump, and Vice-President Vance. Trump and Vance took Zelensky to task for opposing a cease fire, forcing Ukrainian conscripts into an already lost war, throwing good money after bad, and demonizing Vladimir Putin to the point of making peace negotiations impossible. The remarkable confrontation played out like a reality TV episode, one in which Trump did everything but shout in Zelensky's face: "You're fired!", a fate the seriously unfunny comedian more than deserves.


As usual, simplistic characterizations rather than insight dominates the headlines. Zelensky is a "democratic leader" and  Putin is a "dictator," although Trump has - gasp! - called Zelensky himself a dictator. This judgment, our mind managers tell us, is just more evidence of how stupid Trump and his MAGA supporters are. How could Zelensky, champion of the Free World, possibly be a dictator?  Just because he jails his political opponents, bans independent media, and shuts down religious organizations doesn't mean he isn't a democracy-loving freedom-fighter. How could it? 

 

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell is incensed that Trump is "not educable," thus incapable of understanding that U.S. media hacks are infallible in their "value-free" judgments about political reality. Trump "knowingly lies" about key statistics like how much aid the U.S. has sent to Ukraine. Horrors! This he takes to be far more significant than the fact that Trump correctly states that (1) Ukraine cannot defeat Russia on the battlefield (2) that it is therefore pointlessly sacrificing huge numbers of its own people, and (3) that it is "risking WWIII," (especially when it shoots U.S. ATACM missiles deep into Russian territory as it did in the final months of the Biden administration). O'Donnell and his fellow media hacks don't enlighten their audience about any of this, which is the heart of the story vis-a-vis the Ukraine war. Lies of omission, as the late Aldous Huxley noted, are the most effective element of propaganda.*

 

Putin has long objected to NATO expansion, as any Russian head of state necessarily would, and questioned why it still exists after the parallel Warsaw Pact disbanded at the conclusion of the Cold War. The West continually stated that it didn't want any more Berlin Walls, even as it kept expanding the Russia-hating military alliance to the East. NATO liked to claim that it was transforming itself into more of a political organization than a military one, to which Putin sensibly replied, "but if it's a political organization, why did it bomb Yugoslavia?" (in 1999).

 

For Moscow, following through on the Minsk Accords, adopted by Russia, France, Germany, and Ukraine in 2015 and endorsed unanimously by the UN Security Council, was the only path to progress in Ukraine, which had essentially become an extension of NATO. The agreement implicitly assumed no formal membership in NATO for Ukraine, an outcome that any Russian leader would have had to insist on. It called explicitly for disarmament of the Donbass and withdrawal of Russian forces while basing the overall settlement on three elements: (1) demilitarization (2) restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty (3) full autonomy for the Donbass.  


The Minsk Accords were never implemented because Ukraine didn't want them to be and Washington didn't insist on them.

 

Putin has long objected to the U.S.-dominated, "democratic" world order, which is built around Washington using force in international affairs without a thought to the consequences, as in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Putin especially disliked the U.S. overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya. The UN resolution authorizing a no-fly zone over that country was "defective and flawed," he said, because, "It allow[ed] them to do what they like, to undertake any manner of actions against a sovereign state." It reminded him, he said of "a medieval crusade." 

 

In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly at the end of September in 2015, Putin blamed the refugee crisis (roughly five million people displaced) stemming from the Syrian civil war squarely on the West, which had induced hundreds of thousands of desperate families to rely on rickety boats to flee to Greece, the nearest European Union state. The U.S., which supported ISIS, was behaving as though there were "good terrorists and bad terrorists," Putin thought, without noticing that there was no easy way to distinguish the two groups. "Is it," asked Putin, "that the so-called moderates behead people more delicately or in more limited numbers?" Touche.

 

For Washington's neo-con crusaders, the "good" terrorists are whichever ones they're cynically using at the moment, which is why no one should be surprised that the head-choppers displaced Bashar al-Assad in Syria with U.S. air support last fall. Eight months from now they will commemorate 911 for the twenty-fourth time, piously renewing their imaginary permanent opposition to jihadi-style terrorism.


By comparison, Putin is a saint.


 

*Overt lies are also important, of course. For example, Zelensky's claim that Putin did not comply with a 2019 cease-fire and prisoner exchange is not correct. There are photos of the prisoner exchange, which was carried out according to the negotiated agreement. See Aaron Mate and Katie Helper on the Useful Idiots podcast, March 3, 2025.

 


Sources:


Lawrence O'Donnell, "Trump Humiliated again on world stage by British PM," The Last Word, MSNBC, February 28, 2025

 

"Putin" by Philip Short (Henry Holt, 2022) p. 369, 522, 588-9, 652


Noam Chomsky with C. J. Polychroniou, ed. "Illegitimate Authority - Facing The Challenges of Our Time," (Haymarket, 2023), p. 160

Friday, February 21, 2025

Malcolm X: Man of Peace

"Malcolm was our manhood, our living black manhood."

------Ossie Davis 

 

"Treat me like a man, or kill me."

-------Malcolm X[1]

 

 

February 21, 2025 marks sixty years since Malcolm X was gunned down in a hail of bullets at the Audobon Ballroom in New York City as he was starting to give a speech. The previous week his house had been firebombed, and days before that the French government had refused to allow him into the country to fulfill a speaking engagement, apparently fearing the assassination might take place on French soil. 

 

Malcolm fully expected these attempts on his life, which grew out of circumstances surrounding his break with the Nation of Islam the previous year. U.S. intelligence had infiltrated his security team, and at the time of his death Malcolm recognized that though the assassination plot originated with the corrupt advisers around Elijah Muhammad in the Nation of Islam, by the end the circle of intrigue had broadened considerably and the U.S. government was certainly involved.

 

Malcolm was undergoing rapid transformation in the final year of his life. He renounced the aberrant strand of Islam favored by Elijah Muhammad, shed his view that white people could do nothing to end racism, and apologized for having repeatedly called civil rights leaders "Toms" and other degrading nicknames. He lectured and traveled widely, met and talked with important leaders of national liberation movements abroad, and embraced a broad, internationalist vision focused on delivering freedom and justice to all peoples regardless of race. But he stuck to his view that black unity in the United States was a pre-requisite to any constructive change in American race relations.

 

Though often portrayed as a violent extremist (he insisted on self-defense against racist attacks), he was actually quite conservative in his habits (he didn't drink, smoke, gamble, or swear), and was never known to have laid a hand on anyone. James Baldwin considered him one of the gentlest men he ever met, and when Baldwin was once called on to referee a debate between Malcolm and a young civil rights activist - on the assumption that Malcolm would overpower the youth - Baldwin discovered that he was not at all needed. Like an oldest son protecting a younger brother, Malcolm treated the youngster with tender solicitude, smiling indulgently and gently correcting his view that being born in the U.S. was all it took to be a full U.S. citizen: "Now, brother, if a cat has kittens in the oven, does that make them biscuits?"[2]

 

The same gentleness was evident in Malcolm's home life. In a 1992 interview his daughter Attalah remembered him as a firm father, a mushily romantic husband, and a gentle and funny presence sparking frequent laughter throughout the house. Though work required he be away for long periods, he managed to be present even when he was absent by hiding little surprises around the house for his daughters. Then when he was on the road, he would send letters home telling them to go into a certain room and look in a special place to find a treat he had left for them.[3] 

 

How did such a man gain a reputation for uncontrolled rage and violence? Easy. He was born in a deeply racist country.

 

He grew up broke and hungry in a family of eight. "We were so hungry we were dizzy," he recalled years later.[4] His father Earl died when Malcolm was six, run over by a rail car, and his mother was slowly driven insane trying to raise eight children alone after her husband's life insurance company refused to honor the $10,000 policy it had issued him.[5]

 

Disciples of Marcus Garvey, Malcolm's parents were proud and rebellious, living isolated from whites but refusing to reside in officially segregated housing. Malcolm's father took his son along on trips to secret, private homes to hear the "Back To Africa" gospel. This early public exposure with its heavy emphasis on black racial pride prepared Malcolm for the speaker's platform and the barricades years later,[6] but he took a very circuitous route before re-connecting with Garvey's ideas and fashioning them into his life's work and legacy after years of evasive wandering.[7]

 

Born in Omaha, raised in Lansing, the flash of Michigan street life claimed Malcolm by age twelve. Strutting into town with a fistful of reefers, he was soon seen as a rising star on the streets. Bold to the point of recklessness, he openly challenged authority, once telling a notoriously abusive police officer who put a gun to his head to, "Go ahead! Pull the trigger, Whitey." [8]Kids who knew Malcolm at the time foresaw a future of jail and an early grave for him.[9]

 

Malcolm’s fascination for the streets deepened at fifteen, when he spent a summer in Boston, where he was exhilarated by the neon lights, fancy cars, and late-night partying.[10] Though he briefly returned to Michigan, he couldn’t help but be impressed by the fact that blacks from New York and Boston always had a hustle going that gave them money or kept them in clothes, a far better fate than being a ditch-digger or a janitor, which was the limit of realistic black aspirations in the Mid-West. Boston soon proved to be his most natural habitat, a place where he could live out his desire to survive by his wits.[11]

 

Living with his half-sister Ella on "Sugar Hill," Malcolm loathed the status-conscious blacks he encountered there, preferring to hang out with "his people" in the "valley" below:  pool sharks, pimps, hustlers, and hard-working blacks pursuing snatches of weekend escapism. They, and the pawnshops, bars, pool halls, cheap restaurants, walk-up flats, barbershops, beauty salons, and storefront churches that surrounded them, were Malcolm's entire world.[12]

 

Blessed with a steely self-confidence taught him by his Garveyite parents, Malcolm thrived in this environment and quickly developed a commanding presence that belied his age. But he rejected his parents' proud work ethic, and cared not a whit about morality or religion. A fast-talking con artist who excelled at finessing himself out of dangerous situations, easy money was all he lived for.[13]

 

Employed as a shoeshine "boy" at a Boston dance hall, Malcolm was thrilled to see the great bands of the day - Count Basie, Cab Calloway, Gene Krupa, Ella Fitzgerald, Glenn Miller, Tommy Dorsey, and the Andrews sisters.[14] No small part of his excitement was making piles of cash as the middleman for sexual hookups of white men wanting black women and white women wanting black men, proclivities that were not at all in line with racial pronouncements in the land of the supposedly free.[15] Malcolm’s knowledge of this reality would prove to be a source of great uneasiness in his future debate opponents.

 

Inevitably, Malcolm’s life as a hustler drew him to Harlem, where he attracted broad attention with his wide-brimmed hats, orange shoes, and exuberant, loose-fitting “zoot suits.” A familiar figure at uptown magnets like the Audobon Ballroom, Smalls Paradise, the Theresa Hotel, and the Savoy and Renaissance Ballrooms, Malcolm narrowly escaped death on various occasions working as a quasi-pimp, petty thief, and drug dealer for traveling musicians and curbside junkies. His ambition, he wrote in his autobiography, was “to become one of the most depraved, parasitical hustlers among New York’s eight million people.”[16]

 

After eight years of drug-dealing, burglary, numbers-running, and occasionally armed robbery, Malcolm landed in a Massachusetts federal prison at the age of twenty.[17] There he underwent a religious conversion, gave up drugs, dedicated himself to Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam, and became a voracious reader and skilled debater. Paroled in 1952, within a year he was named assistant minister of Temple No. 1 in Detroit, and the year after that minister of Temple No. 7 in Harlem.[18]

 

He soon proved himself an extraordinarily adept disciple, gaining a reputation as the most ascetic young zealot for Allah imaginable.[19]A superb organizer and proselytizer, he was adored by Harlem blacks for his courage and wit, and they called out to him to "make it plain" with his blunt and uncompromising declarations and exquisite sense of drama. He was far and away the Nation’s most effective recruiter, provoking envy and resentment among his peers, which would ultimately form the basis for his assassination. In just a few years, he expanded the flock of the faithful from a few thousand members to many tens of thousands, easily surpassing the efforts even of Elijah Muhammad himself. He was especially good at making converts on streets he formerly prowled as a hoodlum.[20]

 

In short, he found his calling as a minister, though it was not his first choice. In his final year in school his eighth grade English teacher had urged him to “be realistic about being a nigger” and abandon his goal of becoming a lawyer. In a way, though, Malcolm ended up achieving his goal, becoming the most electrifying “lawyer” in U.S. history by relentlessly advancing the most powerful case ever made against American racism.

 

Possessed of a fierce, nationalist critique and a broad international outlook, no one could take Malcolm in debate. A spell-binding speaker with a bitter wit, he spoke in an emotionally charged tone of angry eloquence that blacks considered "good preaching,"[21] always bristling with unimpeachable facts leading directly to heretical conclusions. When unwary adversaries detected what they naively took to be loopholes in his arguments, James Baldwin once observed, they quickly found out they were really hangman's knots that left their cherished rebuttals dangling lifeless in mid-air. 

 

Taught to be humble and submissive, his eyes burned defiance. Told to moderate his politics, he preached revolution "by any means necessary." Advised to imitate "responsible" civil rights leaders, he brought huge black audiences roaring to their feet by detailing the racist brutality of which they were the constant victims.

 

Drug dealer, convict, hustler, thief, Malcolm rose to become the greatest black revolutionary of the 20th century, a prophet telling truths few could comprehend and nobody wanted to hear.[22] Deeply religious, he identified the fight for justice as the central act of faith, which made him that rarest of men who practice what they preach.[23]

 

Flatly refusing to abide the hypocritical pieties of racist Christianity, he angrily denounced the nerve of its God and his preachers for plaguing American blacks in the name of love. He found temporary solace and self-respect under the paternal guidance of Elijah Muhammad, but ultimately could not accept a theology claiming that whites were a genetically impoverished, degenerate race of “blue-eyed Devils,” however compelling the thesis might appear in a white supremacist society dedicated to slavery, lynching, and segregation.[24]

 

Nevertheless, it has to be conceded that the Nation of Islam was a considerable draw in the North, being a religion created by and for blacks, especially those trapped in ghettos and prison, and highly effective at teaching discipline and self-respect as a cure for drug addiction, crime, unemployment, gambling, prostitution, and juvenile delinquency, among other problems routinely found in such environments.[25]

 

Seeing clearly the connection between low self-esteem and such vices, Malcolm indignantly rejected civil rights supporters claiming that blacks should love whites, insisting instead that they love themselves, at least enough to rise in self-defense when violently attacked, as they all too frequently were. He recommended that advocates of the “love your enemies” approach teach it to the Klan before  expecting it of blacks, and insisted in the meantime on "an eye for an eye" as the only language a racist oppressor could reasonably be expected to understand.[26]

 

Appealing to the conscience of the oppressor was simply a fool's errand, Malcolm thought, as the whole point of racism was to allow whites to subjugate blacks on the pretext that they were sub-human and therefore by definition without rights. There was no point in appealing to a conscience that either didn't exist or wasn't allowed to exist, which amounted to the same thing.[27]

 

As sit-ins swept the south in the early sixties Malcolm denounced the hypocrisy of nonviolence at an appearance in Alabama. "If the Negro clergy didn't discourage us from participating in violent action in Germany, Japan, and Korea to defend white America from her enemies,” he announced, “why do these same Negro clergymen become so vocal when our oppressed people want to take the same militant stand against these white brute beasts here in America who are now endangering the lives and welfare of our women and children?"[28]

 

Though a committed Muslim, the most influential holy book Malcolm had to appeal to was the Christian Bible, as he had no path to large black audiences until and unless he successfully engaged with the religious tradition they were most familiar with. Elijah Muhammad taught that whites were simply evil, preaching Christianity to blacks to make them hate themselves, with devastating consequences.[29] With more political sophistication than Muhammad, Malcolm developed the most formidable race critique of Euro-American Christianity of anyone in the modern world, condemning the faith as a "perfect slave religion" that preached salvation in the next life to enslaved, colonized, and segregated blacks while white hypocrites had their heaven in this world.[30]

 

Malcolm blamed the plight of blacks squarely on their acceptance of this white racist Christianity. "Christianity is the white man's religion," he emphasized. "The Holy Bible in the white man's hands and his interpretations of it have been the greatest single ideological weapon for enslaving millions of non-white human beings. Every country that the white man has conquered with his guns, he has always paved the way, and salved his conscience, by carrying the Bible and interpreting it to call people 'heathens' and 'pagans'; then he sends in his guns, then his missionaries behind the guns to mop up."[31]

 

Rejecting focus on the hereafter, Malcolm told his black audiences that their hell was obviously right here on earth. "Hell is when you're dumb. Hell is when you're a slave. Hell is when you don't have freedom and when you don't have justice. And when you don't have equality, that's Hell."[32]

 

One of Malcolm’s greatest strengths was his courage in adopting unpopular stances when conscience and the facts demanded it. Unlike Christian ministers, for example, who reflexively sided with Israel’s Jewish-supremacy in the Middle East, Malcolm's support for the Arab world was so fervent that he was frequently labeled anti-Semitic.[33] He would not have been at all surprised at Israel’s current wholesale massacre and expulsion campaign in Gaza.

 

Unlike civil rights leaders, Malcolm rejected the self-defeating idea that blacks in the United States were a small minority, internationalizing his focus to state that they were in fact part of a world-wide Islamic community of "725 million Muslim brothers and sisters in Africa, Asia and in the brotherhood of Islam," also pointing out that people of color with more than passing familiarity with white racism formed the vast majority of the world's population.[34]

 

Finally, Malcolm’s critical dissection of the March on Washington demonstration in Washington D.C. in August 1963 showed unique insight into the direction black rage was beginning to take due to the persistence of white terrorism after nearly a decade of “non-violent resistance” that was supposedly the cure for it. Acidly dismissing the protest as "the farce on Washington," Malcolm deftly pointed out this appropriate and necessary anger had been deliberately excluded from the day’s agenda:


"
The Negroes were out there in the streets . . . .They were talking about how they were going to march on Washington . . .That they were going to march on Washington, march on the Senate, march on the White House, march on the Congress, and tie it up, bring it to a halt, not let the government proceed. They even said they were going out to the airport and lay down on the runway and not let any airplanes land. I'm telling you what they said. That was revolution. That was revolution. That was the black revolution."

No leader had any chance of stopping it: 

 

"It was the grass roots out there in the street. It scared the white man to death, scared the white power structure in Washington D.C. to death; I was there. When they found out that this black steamroller was going to come down on the capital, they called in . . . . these national Negro leaders that you respect and told them, 'Call it off.' Kennedy said, 'Look, you all are letting this thing go too far.' And Old Tom said, 'Boss, I can't stop it because I didn't start it.' I'm telling you what they said. They said, 'I'm not even in it, much less at the head of it.' They said, 'These Negroes are doing things on their own. They're running ahead of us.' And that old shrewd fox, he said, 'If you all aren't in it, I'll put you in it. I'll put you at the head of it. I'll endorse it. I'll welcome it. I'll help it. I'll join it.'"

And this co-optation worked like a charm: 

 

"This is what they did with the march on Washington. They joined it . . . became part of it, took it over. And as they took it over it lost its militancy. It ceased to be angry, it ceased to be hot, it ceased to be uncompromising. Why it even ceased to be a march. It became a picnic, a circus. Nothing but a circus, with clowns and all. . . ."

No dictator could have achieved more thorough control: 

 

"No, it was a sellout, a takeover. They controlled it so tight, they told those Negroes what time to hit town, where to stop, what signs to carry, what to sing, what speech they could make, and what speech they couldn't make, and then told them to get out of town by sundown."[35] 

 

So James Baldwin flew all the way from Paris, but was not allowed to speak. John Lewis’s speech wondering why the government could indict civil rights activists for civil disobedience but couldn’t bring white terrorists to justice or even stop appointing racist judges to the bench was censored by John and Robert Kennedy, a decision with which Dr. King went along. Lewis read a watered-down speech absent his pointed inquiry – “I want to know – which side is the federal government on?” - while two JFK aides stood by ready to pull the plug on his microphone should he fail to follow the script.[36]

 

Eighteen days later four black girls attending Sunday School in Birmingham were blasted into eternity at the 16th Street Baptist Church.

 

Though Malcolm spent the last thirteen years of his life trying to prevent America’s racial powder keg from exploding into irreparable disaster, the capitalist media never ceased to portray him as a violent madman. After his brutal assassination the New York Times heaped scorn on what the editors took to be Malcolm’s “pitifully wasted” life marked by “ruthless and fanatical belief in violence.” The Washington Post bid good riddance to him as “the spokesman of bitter racism.” Newsweek mocked Malcolm for “blazing racist attacks on the ‘white devils’ and his calls for an American Mau Mau.” Walter Winchell dismissed him as a “petty punk,” and the Nation magazine back-handedly complimented him for being the “courageous leader of one segment of the Negro lunatic fringe.”[37]

 

One of Martin Luther King's associates, Alfred Duckett, provided a far more accurate view, calling Malcolm "our sage and our saint," a prophet who inspired his black brothers and sisters to fight back against racism and persecution. Even Dr. King had to concede that Malcolm's portrayal of the plight of American blacks was accurate and his rage authentic, once reportedly telling a friend that "I just saw Malcolm on television. I can't deny it. When he starts talking about all that's been done to us, I get a twinge of hate, of identification with him."[38]

 

But it may have been Malcolm himself who was the most reliable source on what his work was about, saying in his autobiography that, “sometimes I have dared to dream . . . that one day, history may even say that my voice – which disturbed the white man’s smugness, and his arrogance, and his complacency – that my voice helped to save America from a grave, possibly even fatal catastrophe.”[39]

 

 

Sources:

 

James H. Cone, "Martin & Malcolm & America - A Dream or a Nightmare," (Orbis, 1991)

 

Les and Tamara Payne, "The Dead Are Arising - The Life of Malcolm X" - (Norton, 2020)

 

Alex Haley ed., "The Autobiography of Malcolm X," (Grove, 1964)

 

Howard Zinn, “A People’s History of the United States,” (Vintage, 2003)

 

Taylor Branch, “At Caanan’s Edge – America in the King Years, 1965-68, (Simon & Schuster, 2006)

 

Barbara Rogers interview with Attalah Shabazz, "Bay Sunday," November 15, 1992

 

Michael K. Smith, “Portraits of Empire,” (Common Courage, 2003)

 

 


[1]Cone, p. 251

[2] Smith, p. 110

[3] Barbara Rogers, “Bay Sunday,” November 15, 1992

[4] Payne, p. 94

[5] Payne, p. 89. Malcolm thought his father had been murdered by the Klan, but this appears not to have been the case.

[6] Payne, p. 86

[7] Payne, p. 75

[8] Payne, p. 122

[9] Payne, p. 122, 145

[10] Payne, p. 141

[11] Payne, p. 146

[12] Payne, p. 152

[13] Payne, p. 115

[14] Payne, p. 152-3

[15] Payne, p. 155-6

[16] Payne, p.  168, 170, 174

[17] Cone, p. 154

[18] Payne, p. 272, 274

[19] Payne, p. 278

[20] Payne, p. 285

[21] Cone, p. 172

[22] Cone, p. 152

[23] Cone, p. 164

[24]Cone, p. 170. The worst effects and limitations of Elijah Muhammad’s views were altered or eliminated in Malcolm by his frequent interactions with white university students.

[25] Cone, p. 162

[26] Cone, p. 160

[27] Cone, p. 166

[28] Cone, p. 176

[29] Cone, p. 162

[30] Cone, p. 166

[31] Cone, p. 166, 170

[32] Cone, p. 174

[33] Cone, p. 163

[34] Cone, p. 164

[35] Zinn, p. 457-8

[36] Quoted in Cone, p. 181

[37] Branch, p. 11, 373

[38] Cone, p. 251, 256

[39] Cone, p. 181